By: XN923 - 4th July 2007 at 12:39
Bump? Surely BANG or KABOOOM would be more appropriate 😀
…Not when you are talking about British ordnance from the early part of the Second World War.
By: Whitley_Project - 4th July 2007 at 09:59
Thanks Roy and Mark.
Any idea what ISI stands for?
Here are the details….
Brackets. one has AW370 in a circle and numbers: BI 1809 ISI ;B191 809 ISI EN27 ;A 191 808 ISI AW376. The other one has A101 810 ISI EN1938.
They could also be Hunter parts as AW did a lot of the upgrade work for the export aircraft. If you PM me some part nos. I’ll check them for you.
Cheers…M
By: MarkG - 3rd July 2007 at 09:34
I was offered some AW made parts recently with what looked like hawker part numbers. Wonder if they are sea hawk…
They could also be Hunter parts as AW did a lot of the upgrade work for the export aircraft. If you PM me some part nos. I’ll check them for you.
Cheers…M
By: wv838 - 3rd July 2007 at 09:18
Actually wv838 – on a separate matter I wonder if you have a seahawk parts catalogue? I was offered some AW made parts recently with what looked like hawker part numbers. Wonder if they are sea hawk…
All the best
Oooh… sea hawk goodies… Yummmm….
Would a Vol.3 help? It’s a bit big but thankfully one of our chaps has scanned it all in so I can send it to you on CD. PM me a postal address ?
Cheers,
Roy.
By: Whitley_Project - 3rd July 2007 at 08:43
Bump? Surely BANG or KABOOOM would be more appropriate 😀
Actually wv838 – on a separate matter I wonder if you have a seahawk parts catalogue? I was offered some AW made parts recently with what looked like hawker part numbers. Wonder if they are sea hawk…
All the best
By: Whitley_Project - 3rd July 2007 at 08:40
😀
By: wv838 - 2nd July 2007 at 17:21
Bump? Surely BANG or KABOOOM would be more appropriate 😀
By: Whitley_Project - 2nd July 2007 at 17:03
Bump
Sign In
July 1, 2007 at 12:00 pm