dark light

Martin Baker MB-5 Rep for sale….

WARBIRD MB5 • AVAILABLE FOR SALE • replica Martin Baker MB5. counter rotating props. simlar to WW ll Spitfire. For info. 775-624-2585. • Contact John L. Marlin – JOHN L MARLIN located Reno, NV USA • Telephone: 775-624-2585 • Posted April 14, 2007 • Show all Ads posted by this Advertiser • Recommend This Ad to a Friend • Email Advertiser • Report This Ad

maybe someone can ‘stretch’ it!

From Barnstormers…

TT

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 25th September 2015 at 19:40

And wasn’t there a video of the engine running?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 25th September 2015 at 19:33

Using a P-51D wing and spending a lot of money on it seems an odd way to go about things if you don’t wish it to fly!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

590

Send private message

By: HP111 - 25th September 2015 at 19:21

Whatever the reason for the shortened fuselage, I think we can conclude it was never seriously intended to be a flyer.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 25th September 2015 at 18:55

I seem to recall the owner expressing that he wished it to be shorter due more to the look of the machine. It did end up looking a little ‘Disney’!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,326

Send private message

By: Beermat - 25th September 2015 at 18:19

That’s what I thought.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

23

Send private message

By: Zodiacchris - 25th September 2015 at 18:11

The shorter the fuselage, the more sensitive the aircraft will be in pitch. For example Zenair CH601 Zodiacs have short rear fuselages, and they are very sensitive…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,326

Send private message

By: Beermat - 25th September 2015 at 17:57

That makes more sense. Still baffled by what happened back there.. what did I miss?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

590

Send private message

By: HP111 - 25th September 2015 at 15:00

He built it shorter because the original was too sensitive in pitch

My understanding is that he made the fuselage shorter so that it would fit in his hangar.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,326

Send private message

By: Beermat - 25th September 2015 at 14:42

or anyone?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,326

Send private message

By: Beermat - 25th September 2015 at 13:34

Sorry for being dim. But don’t mock, you tell me, Sabrejet.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,675

Send private message

By: Sabrejet - 25th September 2015 at 13:03

Thanks Oxcart. That’s very interesting, I don’t understand enough about aerodynamics to understand the difference it makes – a shorter moment arm means less inertia to overcome in changing pitch – but I guess there is a leverage principle at work with regard to the action of the elevators? Was this oversensitivity in pitch a feature of the original?

errr… Shall I tell him or you?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,326

Send private message

By: Beermat - 25th September 2015 at 12:39

Thanks Oxcart. That’s very interesting, I don’t understand enough about aerodynamics to understand the difference it makes – a shorter moment arm means less inertia to overcome in changing pitch – but I guess there is a leverage principle at work with regard to the action of the elevators? Was this oversensitivity in pitch a feature of the original?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,800

Send private message

By: Oxcart - 24th September 2015 at 11:46

He built it shorter because the original was too sensitive in pitch

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,162

Send private message

By: Mike J - 24th September 2015 at 07:52

It hasn’t, and as it has sat for a decade in that state now I think it is unlikely that it will fly, at least under present ownership.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 24th September 2015 at 07:49

I take it that it still hasn’t flown, or did I miss that?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,253

Send private message

By: G-ASEA - 24th September 2015 at 00:22

It sat in the hangar most of race week. Still I got to take a few more photos.

Dave

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,326

Send private message

By: Beermat - 19th September 2015 at 22:10

Why was this aircraft so inaccurate -I guess there must have been constraints, I am sure one wouldn’t be that far off by choice if one was spending that much money, without external factors playing a part?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,675

Send private message

By: Sabrejet - 19th September 2015 at 06:36

Sad to see, but I have mixed feelings: my hat is off to Mr. Marlin, but his replica was a caricature rather than a homage. I hope someone can finish it off and maybe get a few of the shapes right?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,253

Send private message

By: G-ASEA - 19th September 2015 at 03:44

The MB-5 was outside its hangar at Stead airfield Reno today. We saw it as we came out from the races. Its in the pit area, will have a look at it tomorrow when we go around the pits. Have seen it for a few years.

Dave

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,657

Send private message

By: topspeed - 18th September 2015 at 12:33

I find it an fashinating aircraft.

1 2
Sign in to post a reply