dark light

  • miniman

differences between spitfire canopys

Hi again guys,
Could a clever spitfire bod help me out please. Im nearly completed my Radio Control Spitfire Mk Vb model, and need a wee bit more info please about the canopy.

The Mk1 canopy had the flat sides, and a bubbled top, the MkV had the blown sides as well, but was the top blown out to the same shape as the early one when viewed from the side? Was it any higher for improved headroom etc?
Im asking this cos ive used Mk1 drawings to build the model, and it only shows the flat sided version.
Im hoping it was the same profile.;)
Im going to make a mould from balsa so I can get the shape just perfect when I vacuum form it.
Ive included a quick pic of her.
Thanks,
Barry:)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,291

Send private message

By: Eddie - 25th January 2007 at 19:28

By the same token, a Mk.V could have one of at least 3 different types of canopy – the some had the flat sided Mk.I type, others had the bulged type as JDK mentioned, and the third type would be the slightly higher canopy for those Mk.Vs that had the internal armoured windscreen.

The third type can be discounted given your model so far, but I think you would probably be safe with the Mk.I type.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,646

Send private message

By: JDK - 25th January 2007 at 18:59

The Mk1 canopy had the flat sides, and a bubbled top, the MkV had the blown sides as well, but was the top blown out to the same shape as the early one when viewed from the side? Was it any higher for improved headroom etc?

Hi Barry – there’s better able to answer than me, but as they’ve not turned up yet…

There’s no single ‘Mk.I’ (Roman, not numeral, note) canopy type. Just talking Mk.I, the very early canopies were flat topped and sided, like the prototype’s, but quickly replaced with bulged topped examples. After that, they were themselves replaced with bulged all around versions to increase headroom and rear view. I don’t know, but the top bulge would be about the same extent in height, but of course a different shape. Close examination of the billions of Spitfire photos on the web should help, bearing the above chronology in mind.

(Sits back and awaits corrections , chapter and verse… 😀 )

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,176

Send private message

By: Robert Whitton - 25th January 2007 at 18:37

Any help? Sorry for the quality its from an old cutting in my files.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,002

Send private message

By: GliderSpit - 25th January 2007 at 18:00

Ive included a quick pic of her.

Nice Dutch 322 Squadron scheme.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

55

Send private message

By: miniman - 25th January 2007 at 14:33

Thanks Daz.
Im more of a Hurricane man myself. I had to build a compadre for my Hurricane, thats how the spitty came about.
Its electric too, just in case you were wondering why theres no exhaust!
I just wanted to make sure it was as near to perfect as I can manage with my skills. Im happy with the result.
Barry

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 25th January 2007 at 14:08

Ah I see.

Looks nice, anyway.

One thing I might suggest would be to invest in one of the big Modeller’s Datafile books on the Spitfire (there’s two – Merlin and Griffon) which have a wealth of info as well as three-view drawings. The three-views themselves would be very useful.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

55

Send private message

By: miniman - 25th January 2007 at 13:44

Hi Daz, She’s a bit smaller than the cambrian jobs, at 1/12th scale, or 36″ span. Its a bit more scale than the cambrian ones too, with scale wing sections and tail areas/outlines. Im going to mould the canopy myself. Im a tight Scotsman, and hate buying anything!!
Barry:)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 25th January 2007 at 12:58

What scale is it? I used to buy canopies for my fun-fighter jobs from Cambrian, which were approx. 1/10th scale (or a bit over).

My best advice might be to google some canopy photos and try that way.

Sign in to post a reply