dark light

  • 1 Group

Original WW2 signs – info sought

Hi
The two signs pictured were recovered, perfectly legally, from a USAAF / RAF (But most probably USAAF) bomb dump near Sheffield, and are destined for a local museum. Obviously the letters indicate individual locations, possibly revetments, as one sign is split, arrows indicating different directions. What we are interested in is the “M.T.M”, what could this stand for? Bear in mind it’s probably USAAF.

Any help or suggestions greatfully recieved.

Many thanks.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

89

Send private message

By: 1 Group - 29th August 2006 at 15:24

They could have less than 26 bays, just lettered up to however many they had. Sign “MTM abc” and “MTM ijk” are maybe missing.

The reply by Robert Stering however is informative, just when we thought it was solved.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 29th August 2006 at 15:11

Moggy

Could they be maintenace bays? A little like going to Charlie browns and going to bay “A” or “C” or whatever.

That only works if they just happen to have twenty-six bays.

Likely?

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

12

Send private message

By: Robert Sterling - 29th August 2006 at 15:10

If this were an American dump, then there would be no Mechanical Transport flight or section instead it would be refered to as the Motor Pool.

If it were a Bristish run site then after MT, which is the prime acronym, there would be no doubt as to what the third letter meant i.e. the Mechanical Transport Maintenance flight would be MT Maint. or MT Maintenance.

MTM is typically the acronym for Medium Trench Mortar.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

89

Send private message

By: 1 Group - 29th August 2006 at 15:06

Moggy

Could they be maintenace bays? A little like going to Charlie browns and going to bay “A” or “C” or whatever.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 29th August 2006 at 14:49

Thanks Swiss Mustangs, I take it that’s a definate? It was what we assumed, cheers.

But why the alphabetical order then?

Would all the Scammells go to ‘S’ and all the Bedfords go to ‘B’?

I’m not sure we’ve got to the bottom of it yet.

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

89

Send private message

By: 1 Group - 29th August 2006 at 14:14

Thanks Swiss Mustangs, I take it that’s a definate? It was what we assumed, cheers.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,125

Send private message

By: Swiss Mustangs - 29th August 2006 at 12:51

Motor Transport Maintenance

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

384

Send private message

By: cdp206 - 29th August 2006 at 12:22

Certainly one of these locations, to the north-west of Sheffield was used as an ordnace storage from late ’43 onwards. Whilst undertaking completely unrelated research at one particular site, I was assured by the (then) tennent farmer that ‘his’ land was used for such storage and clearly remebered the comings and goings of large US wagons. No buildings were erected at this site as all of the GP ordnance was stored open. Given the dates and the increased activity in later months (again according to the farmer) suggests it was a holding area for operations in support of Overlord(?). The anecdotal evidence was given to me during 1996, but it did make it into the historical management history which arose from the project (as part of my degree).

The site from which the signs orginate is further out from Sheffield and does indeed have sime original wartime buildings remaining. The intention is to donate these items (inlcuding a couple which are still in situ) to Aeroventure, although the removal of these will have to be negotiated.

That said, we’re still curious as to what the second ‘M’ refers to in the legend ‘M.T.M’. They are currently in my garage awaiting the attention/advice of an archaeological conservator (when she has a minute in her schedule!) on the best way to clean and preserve these items, which are still in superb condition.

Chris

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

89

Send private message

By: 1 Group - 29th August 2006 at 11:38

Dave
The signs are from a bomb dump near Sheffield, one of two used by the USAAF in WW2. It was all a bit “Hush-hush” as most of the GIs were black. There are other original signs and artefacts on site which will be removed, with the owners permission, so they can be preserved, hopefully before the local darlings get there first! This is why we are not naming the place, if anyone knows where we are referring to please do the same!

As to why the USAAF had bomb dumps near Sheffield, South Yorks, again any comments or info most welcome.

Cheers

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

698

Send private message

By: Atcham Tower - 29th August 2006 at 10:36

Just had a thought – what I have just suggested is probably rubbish because the vehicle driver would have to know what the letters indicated. Where did the notices come from? I thought the USAAF bomb dumps were in the East Midlands and East Anglia.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

698

Send private message

By: Atcham Tower - 29th August 2006 at 10:32

The letters underneath might denote the initial letter of the bases for which the bombs were being collected. ??

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

33

Send private message

By: Flarkey - 28th August 2006 at 23:34

movements?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

89

Send private message

By: 1 Group - 28th August 2006 at 22:13

Just resurrecting the thread following new information, confirms Moggyc’s (and our own) thoughts. A posting on one of the “re-united” websites lists a serviceman as belonging to “motor transport (WW2 quote Moggy!!) MTM.
As ever any views appreciated, although once in the museum they will be annotated as Motor transport, unless we hear different! Despite the reference to “mechanical” transport, it still appears that even WW2 types refer to it as “motor”, probably a corruption of time! Still interested in the last “M” though – maintainance??

Best regards all.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 24th August 2006 at 22:11

Sorry to be pedantic

Never apologise for pedantry.

That’s what we (I) are here for – to learn.

Had you not corrected that it might have become one of the Internets many self validating inaccuracies.

Pleased to be corrected.

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

898

Send private message

By: RadarArchive - 24th August 2006 at 22:00

MT generally refers to ‘Motor Transport’

Moggy

Sorry to be pedantic, by MT actually stands for Mechanical Transport, at least up to the end of the WW2 period at any rate.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

89

Send private message

By: 1 Group - 24th August 2006 at 21:53

Moggy

Yes we’re aware of that, cheers, can’t come up with the other “M” though. There was however a large MT section there so you’re probably on the right lines.

Thanks

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 24th August 2006 at 21:43

MT generally refers to ‘Motor Transport’

Moggy

Sign in to post a reply