dark light

Graham-White Factory – Hendon

Before they change their policy again, it is only open for 2 hours in the morning, I had a visit to Hendon to have a look around the G-W F for the first time. A few aeroplanes I had forgotton the RAFM had.

More picture Here

Brian

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5

Send private message

By: Finlay - 11th August 2006 at 11:03

Multivac, re the upper galleries
I asked one of the warders on a recent visit, and he said they are being turned into an interactive role playing stage set for older school children. They are part of the crew of a downed aircraft and have to take the decisions necessary to get themselves rescued safely. There won’t be any exhibits up there, and it won’t be public space.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

131

Send private message

By: multivac - 10th August 2006 at 22:45

Sorry, I tried for irony and missed.

My other interest is Archaeology and frequently parts of the British Museum are closed – reason not enough staff. I overheard a visitor from the USA pleading to get into one gallery but with no luck – he was going home the next day.

So I agree with JEEPMAN, that the RAFM should be able to open all of its galleries when the museum is open.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,647

Send private message

By: jeepman - 10th August 2006 at 20:49

At last the RAFM seems to have got itself sorted out with respect to the G-W hanger.

Sorry but I can’t agree with that………….

Any museum that only has key galleries open for a small part of the day has got to be “failing” in my book.

Can you imagine the fuss if the IWM restricted access to parts of Lambeth, or Duxford, the National Gallery denied access to a famous Turner, Holbein, Reynolds, Gainsborough or Monet, the V&A restricted access to it’s gallery of costume or the British Museum to the Sutton Hoo treasure. What would be the fall out if you couldn’t see the Flying Scotsman at the NRM except for 5 minutes around noon on any day that starts with a “W”.

If they have to do it then they could at least alternate between morning and afternoon opening on a daily, known, sequence to accommodate individual’s preferences and schedules.

If they can’t adequately man what they’ve got, how are they going to manage new developments?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

131

Send private message

By: multivac - 10th August 2006 at 20:23

At last the RAFM seems to have got itself sorted out with respect to the G-W hanger.

Now I’ll have to make a more planned visit and not base such around some retail therapy down at that other H place.
“How do I get to H?” “Just follow the yellow bags sir!” 😉

By the way what’s happening with the gallery in the main hall? When I tried for a look recently it was closed, and not much evidence of any exhibits up there either.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,005

Send private message

By: TEXANTOMCAT - 8th August 2006 at 13:59

Depends – you need Listed Building Consent (Planning Permission) to demolish them but what I imagine has happened is that the MOD lawyers will have put provision in the contract for sale that the land will be sold at x price but the developers will covenant to dismantle, remove and re-erect the building as part of the transfer agreement, I assume this will be reflected in the selling price. Linked will be their consent to demolish any other listed buildings not required on site.

Lawyers hat off. 😉

TT

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,995

Send private message

By: SADSACK - 8th August 2006 at 13:44

I would guess the developers want to get a move on they must have waited ages to use the land that the buildings occupy. Mind you is that how it works when you buy listed buildings?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,005

Send private message

By: TEXANTOMCAT - 8th August 2006 at 13:38

Great stuff Steve, that was news to me too- lets hope they save the gatehouse and its carved RFC crest also

TT

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,530

Send private message

By: Steve Bond - 8th August 2006 at 13:11

Yes, I am told once the negotiations have been completed over the financial arrangements (along the same lines as those for the GW hangar).

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,995

Send private message

By: SADSACK - 8th August 2006 at 13:05

re:

Is it definite they are moving the watch office?

Be nice to shift a Dove to park in front of it like the famous shot from the 50s.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,530

Send private message

By: Steve Bond - 8th August 2006 at 08:47

So presumably the staffing problems will only get worse once the watch office has been relocated onto RAFM land?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,462

Send private message

By: ALBERT ROSS - 7th August 2006 at 20:23

just for 2 hours per day.

Whilst it’s a start, opening the Grahame-White Factory for just 2 hours a day

…WHICH ‘two hours’? :confused:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,005

Send private message

By: TEXANTOMCAT - 7th August 2006 at 16:26

Well said Robbo and Andy.

I have posted before that I have been fortunate to be able to get into the G-WF each time I’ve visited – apparently more through luck than judgement!

It IS a national treasure and shows how ‘context’ really sets off an exhibit(s)

TT

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,233

Send private message

By: Andy in Beds - 7th August 2006 at 14:58

That comes across really mealy-mouthed, as if it was the best you can say about it.

It is a brilliant project, well executed, and marred only by erratic accessibility, and possibly a lack of in-depth captioning.

Moggy

Moggy,
I spent two excellent hours in the CGW building on Saturday morning.
The attendant, who’s name was Paul, couldn’t have been more accommodating and the exhibits are in fine fettle and more stuff is being added all the time.

The CGW building really is a treasure.
After so much complaining about the building being closed on previous visits, we took the time to write and thank the Hendon authorities that they’ve got the place open again.
I also discovered the reasons behind the stories last year regarding the heating system. The original system was a severe fire hazard as installed and did have to be completely replaced.

Andy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 7th August 2006 at 14:20

At least the aeroplanes are not squashed in and the lightings reasonable.

What do you mean ‘at least’?

That comes across really mealy-mouthed, as if it was the best you can say about it.

It is a brilliant project, well executed, and marred only by erratic accessibility, and possibly a lack of in-depth captioning.

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,324

Send private message

By: ollieholmes - 7th August 2006 at 13:59

It is nice to see that they have finaly opened it up. I was able to get acsess at the end of last year and was impressed by it. The aeroplanes are realy well spaced out in there and the lighting there is so much better than the rest of the museum i feel.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

228

Send private message

By: lotus72 - 6th August 2006 at 21:20

I walked around the Grahame-White factory at Hendon last year, brilliant stuff.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,010

Send private message

By: pogno - 6th August 2006 at 21:03

That looks just like a museum should, aeroplanes that appear as if they are serviceable and ready to be wheeled out at dawn and flown.

Sorry not a fan of displays that cram so much in it becomes difficult to tell whats what.

Sign in to post a reply