dark light

Burmese Seafires

After the much publicised sale of these machines to the U.S news on them has become decidedly thin – are any close to flight and has the Griffon 58 contra prop idea been applied to any?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,150

Send private message

By: stringbag - 8th May 2006 at 13:39

BAe did indeed produce six reduction gearboxes for the Shackleton engines.
I have heard however that limitations on the power settings had to be put in place on the RNHF ‘Fly, though will have to check why.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

439

Send private message

By: Steve T - 8th May 2006 at 02:14

Hi–

As I recall, sometime in the eighties (when Shack AEW2s were still operational), at least one Griffon intended for a Firefly was “hybridised” to employ Griff 57 (Shack) parts on a Griff 74 (Firefly 6). The engine builders referred to the resulting engine as a “Griffon Mk.574”. (Bit like what CWH did with the undercart on their Lanc–Lincoln struts used, so Shack 2 wheels and brakes could be installed, with their much more available tires. Necessity is the mother of invention!)

Firefly Is used a later Griffon than the short-block VI on Seafire XV/XVIIs, so not a candidate for “transplant”. I think SX336’s engine is the first Griff VI to turn since Mk.XV Seafire PR451 was run up briefly in 1986…

S.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 7th May 2006 at 14:15

Stuart – RR at Bristol converted a Griffon 58 to single prop shaft for a BBMF PR.19. I should imagine if it was a truly commercial job the bill would have been a little on the large side!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 7th May 2006 at 13:08

Wasn’t there a move to convert at least one 57/58 griffon to single prop shaft? they are only single stage aren’t they , but they are two speed ; what mark were the XV Seafires griffons originally ? and how do they compare with the 57/58’s.

Single stage yes but the Shack engine has the massive water injection aspiration system making it by my judgement too long to fit the XII, XV & XVII.

I took the precaution to acquire, when offered, a wheel house and carburettor assembly from a Mk VI Griffon to generate another engine for the future.

Those engines are about. Canada and Burma.

Mark

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,986

Send private message

By: stuart gowans - 7th May 2006 at 12:49

Wasn’t there a move to convert at least one 57/58 griffon to single prop shaft? they are only single stage aren’t they , but they are two speed ; what mark were the XV Seafires griffons originally ? and how do they compare with the 57/58’s.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,355

Send private message

By: David Burke - 7th May 2006 at 11:51

I wonder in the long run if some of the Ethiopian Firefly recoveries will ‘donate’
their engines to Seafire XV projects . The sad reality is that a Firefly cannot command a resale value anywhere near a Spitfire/Seafire.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 7th May 2006 at 10:54

Only one made it to the US, and as I understand it , it has yet to be sold.

Short Griffons are incredibly rare, and that will be a big problem in restoring that aircraft to fly. Coupled with that, there is an awful lot missing from it!

Bruce

Perhaps not actually for sale methinks.

The owner has added Canadian PR503 to his collection.

I guess two Seafire XV’s makes a ‘fleet’. 🙂

Mark

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,370

Send private message

By: Bruce - 7th May 2006 at 09:56

Only one made it to the US, and as I understand it , it has yet to be sold.

Short Griffons are incredibly rare, and that will be a big problem in restoring that aircraft to fly. Coupled with that, there is an awful lot missing from it!

Bruce

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,768

Send private message

By: Mark V - 6th May 2006 at 21:22

These Seafires were earlier models (15’s, from memory) so I do not think the contra prop concept would be appropriate as they have ‘short’ noses.

Sign in to post a reply