March 24, 2006 at 9:57 am
I wonder if anyone can answer a question I have relating to Spitfire PR.XIX G-RRGN/PS853. I watch this aircraft from my office window each Spring/Summer as she is put through her paces in the skies above Filton airfield. I took a little more interest in her recently when reading Flypast’s Spitfire 70 publication. I realised she used to be on strength with the BBMF until she was sold to offset the costs of a Hurricane restoration. She would have been with the BBMF in 1987. This was the year I spent a week at RAF Coningsby on annual camp with the ATC. We had a section visit to the BBMF and had our photo taken in front of a Spit. I am not one for serial numbers now and even less so then, so I am not 100% sure if this was the same aircraft. I am pretty confident that the Spit in the photo is PR.XIX as she has a Griffon and a 5 bladed Rotol prop but I understand that the BBMF have had 2 PR.XIX and I don’t know whether both were at Coningsby at the same time. I would be greatful if anyone could confirm this for me. It would be nice to know that the aircraft I got so close to when I was 15 now graces the skies outside my window each summer (and long may she do so).
I have attached the shot from ’87. It’s a dodgy photo as it was scanned on pretty lo res. (note the strange two-tone effect on the uniforms is not the photo – it rained like it can only rain in Lincolnshire!)
Thanks
By: jbs - 9th May 2006 at 11:27
red964,
Fair enough, it is the bit about it being at a “jaunty angle” and it “towering above the road” that is confusing me as I do not believe that PM651 has ever been displayed like this.
Really stumped
Found it!!!!
This is what is now on the gate at RAF Benson.
MyAviation.net:
Photographer © Darren Smith
It is a PR Mk.XI Replica “EN343”
By: Groundcrew - 27th March 2006 at 17:21
PM631 still has the invasion stripes.
You can see it on this years BBMF website is available at:
http://www.deltaweb.co.uk/bbmf/home.html
By: jbs - 27th March 2006 at 09:10
Hiya
Having never been to Leuchars and only ever seeing 1 PR spit at a jaunty angle I am 99% certain It was at Benson.
I think at the time the queens flight was there and some Met Andovers.
I remember taking a wander around and ending up near the main gate and this PR spitfire was towering above the road. It was all very impressive.The reason I thought it might be 651 was that it had been there before
http://www.warbirdregistry.org/spitregistry/spitfire-pm651.html
however the records seem to indicate 651 was in storage.I doubt it was a plastic one as I also went to Church Fenton Later and they still had their real one on the gate.
confused.
— EDIT
Ive just spotted on the list RAF Benson, 1971-1988.
– Gate guard.
hehehehe I knew I was right about it..——-
red964,
Fair enough, it is the bit about it being at a “jaunty angle” and it “towering above the road” that is confusing me as I do not believe that PM651 has ever been displayed like this.
Really stumped
By: jbs - 27th March 2006 at 09:04
Benson gate guard PM651 – now in store at Stafford – not sure about it “towering above the road” :confused:
G-ORDY,
Nice shot, could you tell me what year was it taken?
By: DazDaMan - 27th March 2006 at 08:46
Benson do/did have a fibreglass “PRXI” Spit on the gate, I think. Perhaps that’s what you’re thinking of? :confused:
(Too early on a Monday to be trying to think!!!)
By: G-ORDY - 26th March 2006 at 18:00
Benson gate guard PM651 – now in store at Stafford – not sure about it “towering above the road” :confused:
By: Merlinmagic - 26th March 2006 at 17:54
Anyone got any pics of the THUM Spits at Woodvale?
MM
By: red964 - 26th March 2006 at 17:48
Hiya
Having never been to Leuchars and only ever seeing 1 PR spit at a jaunty angle I am 99% certain It was at Benson.
I think at the time the queens flight was there and some Met Andovers.
I remember taking a wander around and ending up near the main gate and this PR spitfire was towering above the road. It was all very impressive.
The reason I thought it might be 651 was that it had been there before
http://www.warbirdregistry.org/spitregistry/spitfire-pm651.html
however the records seem to indicate 651 was in storage.
I doubt it was a plastic one as I also went to Church Fenton Later and they still had their real one on the gate.
confused.
— EDIT
Ive just spotted on the list RAF Benson, 1971-1988.
– Gate guard.
hehehehe I knew I was right about it..
——-
By: DBW - 25th March 2006 at 11:10
]
Conclusion
Therefore the Mk.XIX shown in the picture could be either PS853 or PS915, as at that time they where both wearing similar PR colour schemes.
But, I am pretty sure that it is in fact PS915 not that long after she joined the flight. My reasons are the markings on the propellor blades which match markings on contemporary photos of a similar vintage in my collection.
Almost certainally PS915, if PS853 was under modification for the new griffon, she wouldn’t be sitting complete and looking ready for flight, almost certainally the cowlings/engine/prop wouldn’t be on.
By: big bristols - 24th March 2006 at 23:42
spitfires?YAWN……NOT AGAIN
By: jbs - 24th March 2006 at 22:19
Hiya –
I cant shed any light on your question im afraid, but in a similiar vein I was at RAF Benson in the mid 80s on ATC camp and remember (I think it was Benson) there being a superb gate guardian PR XIX spitfire.If ever a spitfire gate guardian stood out more I cant think of one better than the PR spitfire leaping up at a jaunty angle in the middle of the roundabout before the main gate.
If I won the euromillions tonight its the first thing I would buy.
That would have been PM651 which is currently in storage as part of the RAF museum’s Reserve Collection
Edit
Red964
Thinking more about this one and I’m not convinced I’m right, are you positive it was RAF Benson?
The reason I ask is that if we forget Mk.XIX and RAF Benson, the machine that fits the rest of the bill, i.e. “jaunty angle” and “middle of the roundabout before the main gate”, then this sounds suspiciously like Mk.21 LA198 at RAF Leuchars, Scotland. It was displayed on a pole at the main gate between 1986-1989.
Could it have been this one instead ?
By: jbs - 24th March 2006 at 22:17
From my notes,
PM631
late 1984 – Camo scheme, with D-Day stripes (91 Sqn, DL-E)
1990 – SEAC scheme 11 Sqn “N”, “Mary” on port engine cowling
Nov 1995 – SEAC scheme, AOC 681 Sqn “S”
PS853
up to 1987 – PRU scheme, no D-Day stripes or code letter
Between 1987 and 1989 she was grounded under modification to take the ex.Shackleton Griffon 58M
July 1989 – First flight with new engine. PRU scheme, “C” 16 Sqn, 2nd TAFPS915
My notes seem to fail me here, as I have her wearing the Mk.XIV Prototype scheme twice !!!
Dec 1986 – Prototype Mk.XIV scheme to represent JF319 (Camo with Yellow undersides)
1987-1988 – PRU Blue scheme ?? (anyone any confirmation of this?)
1992 – Prototype Mk.XIV scheme to represent JF319 (Camo with Yellow undersides)
early 1998 – SEAC scheme, 153 Sqn “UM-G” with a Black Panter on the port side roundelIf anyone can put me right here that would be appreciated, failing that I will have a poke through my photo’s and books this evening to find out for definate.
Hope this is useful
This is from my books and photo’s
PM631
early 1984 – Camo scheme, with D-Day stripes (91 Sqn, DL-E, to represent a Mk.XIV at the time of the D-Day landings)
early 1990 – SEAC scheme 11 Sqn “N”, “Mary” on port engine cowling
Nov 1995 – SEAC scheme, AOC 681 Sqn “S”
PS853
early 1974 – PRU Blue scheme, no D-Day stripes or code letter
Between 1987 and 1989 she was grounded under modification to take the ex.Shackleton Griffon 58M
July 1989 – First flight with new engine and new colour scheme. PRU scheme, “C” 16 Sqn, 2nd TAF (this is when she gained her D-Day stripes and “C” code letter)
PS915
March 1987 – PR Blue on delivery to Conningsby
early 1992 – Camouflage scheme with Yellow undersides to represent the first Prototype Mk.XIV, JF319
early 1998 – SEAC scheme, 153 Sqn “UM-G” with a Black Panter on the port side roundel
Conclusion
Therefore the Mk.XIX shown in the picture could be either PS853 or PS915, as at that time they where both wearing similar PR colour schemes.
But, I am pretty sure that it is in fact PS915 not that long after she joined the flight. My reasons are the markings on the propellor blades which match markings on contemporary photos of a similar vintage in my collection.
By: red964 - 24th March 2006 at 17:22
Benson Spit
Hiya –
I cant shed any light on your question im afraid, but in a similiar vein I was at RAF Benson in the mid 80s on ATC camp and remember (I think it was Benson) there being a superb gate guardian PR XIX spitfire.
If ever a spitfire gate guardian stood out more I cant think of one better than the PR spitfire leaping up at a jaunty angle in the middle of the roundabout before the main gate.
If I won the euromillions tonight its the first thing I would buy.
By: Cutters Goose - 24th March 2006 at 15:38
Thanks to all of you for responding to this. Apologies for not digging further before I posted but hey, it’s still classed as research on the web!! I guess the D-Day stripes will be the telling factor. I will ask the BBMF if they can shed any light on it.
By: DBW - 24th March 2006 at 14:10
PS915 was delivered in PR blue and then painted in prototype markings after a few years (4 or 6?) of use.
By: jbs - 24th March 2006 at 13:53
From my notes,
PM631
late 1984 – Camo scheme, with D-Day stripes (91 Sqn, DL-E)
1990 – SEAC scheme 11 Sqn “N”, “Mary” on port engine cowling
Nov 1995 – SEAC scheme, AOC 681 Sqn “S”
PS853
up to 1987 – PRU scheme, no D-Day stripes or code letter
Between 1987 and 1989 she was grounded under modification to take the ex.Shackleton Griffon 58M
July 1989 – First flight with new engine. PRU scheme, “C” 16 Sqn, 2nd TAF
PS915
My notes seem to fail me here, as I have her wearing the Mk.XIV Prototype scheme twice !!!
Dec 1986 – Prototype Mk.XIV scheme to represent JF319 (Camo with Yellow undersides)
1987-1988 – PRU Blue scheme ?? (anyone any confirmation of this?)
1992 – Prototype Mk.XIV scheme to represent JF319 (Camo with Yellow undersides)
early 1998 – SEAC scheme, 153 Sqn “UM-G” with a Black Panter on the port side roundel
If anyone can put me right here that would be appreciated, failing that I will have a poke through my photo’s and books this evening to find out for definate.
Hope this is useful
By: DazDaMan - 24th March 2006 at 12:15
I think you are right but she was in camoflage, the Spit in the picture has a PR finish. When was PM631 painted in SEAC PR colours?
D’oh! I meant “D-day stripes and camo”! :rolleyes:
It’s frustrating without the books in front of me, but I think PM got her SEAC *fighter* colours after the camo-and-stripes. The PR SEAC colours were more recent – mid-90s perhaps?
By: DBW - 24th March 2006 at 11:34
I think you are right but she was in camoflage, the Spit in the picture has a PR finish. When was PM631 painted in SEAC PR colours?
By: DazDaMan - 24th March 2006 at 11:03
I seem to recall PM631 wore D-Day stripes up until at least 1986.
PS915 was in PRU blue only after rebuild before repainting sometime later, while PS853 has worn those same markings for a number of years. Without the books in front of me I can’t be certain, but I’m about 80% sure….
By: DBW - 24th March 2006 at 10:57
Not sure but didn’t PS853 have invasion stripes under the wings whilst PS915 didn’t? I think PM631 was in camo. I can’t see stripes in the picture so believe it was PS915.