Lasham Now ?

As politicians say I couldn’t possibly comment on which photo is referred to but if one of mine on that thread then yes I did take it and retain the copyright and it was taken back in the 60s! 😀

I found a colour photo with a copyright on it of 2005. This pic shows sea hawk hulks at Lasham.

Is there anything left at Lasham or is the copyright date erroneous ?

Roy.

The date is not erroneous as it most likely describes when the photo was first “published” as this can affect the duration of copyright in certain countries as it may determine the start point of the protection period. The copyright endorsement does not relate to when it was taken that is a quite separate matter.

Consul
Might Roy not be referring to one of your lovely pics on the scrapyard thread ? it which case it would be “as it describes” & not “most likely describes” 🙂

and remember that quite a few people put ‘copyright’ on photographs they have no right to copyright.

Unless that photograph was published by the original photographer (which it may well have been) then the copyright is almost certainly questionable.

I found a colour photo with a copyright on it of 2005. This pic shows sea hawk hulks at Lasham.

Is there anything left at Lasham or is the copyright date erroneous ?

Roy.

The date is not erroneous as it most likely describes when the photo was first “published” as this can affect the duration of copyright in certain countries as it may determine the start point of the protection period. The copyright endorsement does not relate to when it was taken that is a quite separate matter.

The only real hulk at Lasham these days is G-BLGB the Short 360 fuselage near the ATC hangars.

It’s probably an old photo, but only just published. The last time I saw Sea Hawk fuselages at Lasham was in the Staravia Yard in February 1969.