and your problem with that is what?

You come up with a range of dates and when you get responses, you question them?

YOU were the one stating OTU, so why question the response? You NOW post MORE information which might have helped if included with the initial posting.

Sorry, chum, I’m outa here…………

Woh there, I’m not questioning anyones responses – far from it, I’m trying to engage in an intelligent discussion about the facts surrounding a fatal accident. I did’t post some of the other information at the time because I didn’t think it was needed at the time, that’s to say, I could have written pages of stuff that some might not find relevant – you have to stop somewhere and wait for a response!
If you read my post properly, you will see that I came to the conclusion that the a/c might not be from 15 OTU at all, so don’t quote me as stating it was.
Besides that, when I asked you why you were saying ‘assuming it’s an OTU’ I wasn’t contradicting myself, I was simply asking what you meant- ie. that you had found this info that related to OTU losses only etc.
Sorry if I came across as ‘questioning’ as I said I was trying to engage, not put you off.
If you would like to discuss further, I would be grateful for your input, otherwise relax a little more.