March 8, 2005 at 2:13 pm
For the Fury nut’s about the place :rolleyes: ,
What can you guy’s tell us all about these pic’s please I got from Axl’s :confused: .
just for some fun O.k. 😉
Did the last one with only one gear down end well!!!! 😮
Cheer’s all 😀 , Tally :dev2: Ho! :dev2: Ho! Phil :diablo: .
By: grounded - 10th March 2005 at 09:13
Fury pix
It would appear that a lot of you guys have a soft spot for the Hawker Fury, we had one here in NZ a few years back and I have quite a few photos of it. At the moment I am having problems up loading so it is one at a time for now. 😮
By: Chris Broad - 9th March 2005 at 11:42
A belly landing was impossible, because the lowered wheel wouldn’t retract!
Putting 956 in the sea was the best option, and followed the recommendation in the pilots notes.TF956 was lost over 15 years ago now, hard to believe.
It seems like yesterday that it, and Fury T20 WG655 were pounding the Yeovilton circuit. Happy Days 🙂
Oh i see, that really is harsh. Such a damn shame. I was never lucky or old enough to see those two Sea Furies. The first time i ever saw a flying example was VR930 at DX Legends 2001 and was hooked by the whining roar of the Centaurus! Then such a wait to see one again after the sleeve valve failure… Of course i was over the moon when i heard of her return to the circuit mid last year and promptly attended Biggin Hill to re-acquaint myself with such a beautiful aircraft. Ahhhh… roll on the airshow season!
By: grounded - 9th March 2005 at 06:56
FURY CRASH.
I just love those Hawker Furys, But not in the state this ones in . I did not take the photo and have no details.
By: STORMBIRD262 - 9th March 2005 at 04:57
Ditched
Thank’s Guy’s for all the info 🙂 .
I don’t remember that happenning 😮 , was the aircraft recovered from the water 🙁 :confused: .
great pitty if it was not found 🙁 🙁 .
Cheer’s all 😀 , Tally :dev2: Ho! :dev2: Ho! Phil :diablo: .(did anymore of these Fury’s come to grief :confused: )
By: EN830 - 8th March 2005 at 23:10
What are you talking about … ? 😉
Cheat 🙂
By: stringbag - 8th March 2005 at 22:45
It really was quite unfortunate. This is the first time i’ve seen any photographs of TF956’s last flight. I should imagine a belly landing was also disregarded aswell?
A belly landing was impossible, because the lowered wheel wouldn’t retract!
Putting 956 in the sea was the best option, and followed the recommendation in the pilots notes.
TF956 was lost over 15 years ago now, hard to believe.
It seems like yesterday that it, and Fury T20 WG655 were pounding the Yeovilton circuit. Happy Days 🙂
By: ...starfire - 8th March 2005 at 21:15
What are you talking about … ? 😉
By: EN830 - 8th March 2005 at 21:04
I know I’m being pedantic but isn’t that a Nimrod 1
By: stewart1a - 8th March 2005 at 19:25
WH588 is being restored in Scandanavia anybody know how far she is to the final product?
By: DazDaMan - 8th March 2005 at 19:06
Sea Fury WH588 was owned by Paul Morgan, fatally killed in it when it overturned at Sywell in 2001.
The Sea Fury with the “HP” on the fin is owned by Howard Pardue.
By: ...starfire - 8th March 2005 at 18:52
Some Furies from the web


🙂
By: Chris Broad - 8th March 2005 at 15:16
The one with only one wheel down was the RNHF’s TF956,and no it didn’t end well. Having flown around for hours attempting to lower the other leg by all the means he could think of (including some touch and goes as seen in the photo),the pilot finally elected to point the aircraft out to sea and bail out. It was felt that a single-leg landing would’ve been more dangerous,hence the decision to bail out.
It really was quite unfortunate. This is the first time i’ve seen any photographs of TF956’s last flight. I should imagine a belly landing was also disregarded aswell? Suirely it would seem a more viable prospect than a single-leg landing. Less chance of ground looping and as warbirds go, the Sea Fury has a relatively smooth undersurface (although one could argure the dangers of belly landing such a heavy aircraft). Seems such a shame. Was pointing it out to sea really the best option? Of course Pilot safety is paramount and i’m sure everything was done that could have been done to try and save this aircraft – but to no avail. 🙁 🙁
By: Ant.H - 8th March 2005 at 14:19
The one with only one wheel down was the RNHF’s TF956,and no it didn’t end well. Having flown around for hours attempting to lower the other leg by all the means he could think of (including some touch and goes as seen in the photo),the pilot finally elected to point the aircraft out to sea and bail out. It was felt that a single-leg landing would’ve been more dangerous,hence the decision to bail out.