February 22, 2005 at 9:15 pm
Why is it, I discuss F-100’s, Drakens, F-104’s, Hunters, MiG-19’s etc. in the “Modern Military Forum”? ๐
Best regards
By: Malin - 23rd February 2005 at 14:10
atc pal
Great photos off the old SAS airliner. My favourite SAS plane is the MD80 with out any doubt ๐ .
And Saab draken isnโt that old to be put in the Historic Aviation ๐
By: adrian_gray - 23rd February 2005 at 13:25
It’s just a jump to the left…
For a minute when I saw that title I thought we were going REALLY off topic… ๐
Thankfully, however, not too much crossdressing – more crossposting!
Mike, this Forum told me that the old RAF Wethersfield “gate guard”, an F-100, was still alive and well so they can’t be too uppity about how modern they are or aren’t. There’s just a lot of propellor types here, that’s all.
Adrian
By: mike currill - 23rd February 2005 at 13:04
Why is it, I discuss F-100’s, Drakens, F-104’s, Hunters, MiG-19’s etc. in the “Modern Military Forum”? ๐
Best regards
Surely this is the correct forum for these historic legends.
By: atc pal - 23rd February 2005 at 00:20
Yes, why did “they” throw away that perfect logo, the viking ship. Just to look like everybody else. We came in peace (sometimes) – all 3 Nordic countries.
By: T J Johansen - 22nd February 2005 at 23:40
Nice looking DC-9. Really miss the old Dragon head SAS logos. They were much better than the current ones.
T J
By: atc pal - 22nd February 2005 at 23:15
Here’s one
(should’ve been in the commercial forum) ๐ฎ
When McDonnell-Douglas/Boeing? checked the design of the MD85/B-717, they put the computers into finding a better wing. In the end they couldn’t come up with a better shape/airfoil than the original DC-9 wing, made by human engineers and slide rules.
(Good story! Is it true?)
Told to me by a pretty reliable DC-9/MD80 pilot.
pic: http://karsten.thiee.free.fr/37/SAS%20DC-9.jpg
By: atc pal - 22nd February 2005 at 22:38
Yes, Master!
By: Flood - 22nd February 2005 at 22:09
The voices told you to?:confused:
Flood