I am fully aware of all the arguments about sites being memorials and being historical in context. I do not agree with that view unless a real memorial is funded and put on site.

What exactly do you class as a “real memorial”? As far as I’m concerned if the families of those who died in a crash count the site and any remaining wreckage as a memorial,then a memorial it is.

In my view anyone who disturbs a fatal crash site(for any reason) is no better than some yob who vandalises any other grave or memorial.

G.O.