What Makes Euro-canards better than Russian fighters?

Dear sirs,

There has been intense debate on this forums recently concerning Americans fighters and tactics versus Euro-canard fighters and tactics. The accusations where made concerning Americans and there enthusiasm for the aircraft.
But the thought occurred to me concerning the Euro-canard fighters, there fans and the designers that make them. Can someone please explain to me in laymans terms why a Typhoon is better than a Su-30 and the Su-30MKI?

* Crew: 2
* Length: 21.935 m (72.97 ft)
* Wingspan: 14.7 m (48.2 ft)
* Height: 6.36 m (20.85 ft)
* Wing area: 62.0 m² (667 ft²)
* Empty weight: 17,700 kg (39,021 lb)
* Loaded weight: 24,900 kg (54,900 lb)
* Max takeoff weight: 34,500 kg (76,060 lb)
* Powerplant: 2× AL-31FL low-bypass turbofans
o Dry thrust: 7,600 kgf (74.5 kN, 16,750 lbf) each
o Thrust with afterburner: 12,500 kgf (122.58 kN, 27,560 lbf) each

Performance

* Maximum speed: Mach 2.0 (2,120 km/h, 1,320 mph)
* Range: 3,000 km (1,620 nmi) at altitude
* Service ceiling: 17,300 m (56,800 ft)
* Rate of climb: 230 m/s (45,275 ft/min)
* Wing loading: 401 kg/m² (82.3 lb/ft²)
* Thrust/weight: 1.0

* Crew: 1 (operational aircraft) or 2 (training aircraft)
* Length: 15.96 m (52 ft 5 in)
* Wingspan: 10.95 m (35 ft 11 in)
* Height: 5.28 m (17 ft 4 in)
* Wing area: 51.2 m2[194] (551 ft2)
* Empty weight: 11,150 kg (24,560 lb)
* Loaded weight: 16,000 kg[194][195] (35,300 lb)
* Max takeoff weight: 23,500 kg (51,800 lb)
* Powerplant: 2× Eurojet EJ200 afterburning turbofan
o Dry thrust: 60 kN (13,500 lbf) each
o Thrust with afterburner: 89 kN ref RR (20,000 lbf) each
* Fuel capacity: 4,500 kg (9,920 lb) internal[194]

Performance

* Maximum speed:
o At altitude: Mach 2 (2,495 km/h, 1,550 mph)[196][197][198]
o At sea level: Mach 1.2[193] (1,470 km/h / 913.2 mph)[199]
o Supercruise: Mach 1.1–1.5[191][200]
* Range: 2,900 km (1,802 mi)
* Combat radius:
o Ground attack, lo-lo-lo: 601 km (325 nmi)
o Ground attack, hi-lo-hi: 1,389 km (750 nmi)
o Air defence with 3-hr CAP: 185 km (100 nmi)
o Air defence with 10-min loiter: 1,389 km (750 nmi) [201][194]
* Ferry range: 3,790 km (2,300 mi)
* Service ceiling: 19,810 m (55,000 ft)
* Rate of climb: >315 m/s[202][203] (62,000 ft/min[204])
* Wing loading: 312 kg/m2[194] (64.0 lb/ft2)
* Thrust/weight: 1.15

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eurofighter_Typhoon

With barely any modern AESA deployed. The radars look the same on paper.
The Su series is more maneuverable in close. The Russians have state of the art jamming (MIG21-BIS). And the next generation T-50 looks to super cede the Euro-canards in everyday. What makes the Typhoon, Griphen and the Rafale better? Are they better simply because they are made in Europe? please explain. Are the Euro-canard fighters better than the Su-35,T-50?