dark light

The Future of the B-52 – TIME UP?

What is the future of the B-52 in an age where future aggressors and potential enemies of the United States (and / or NATO as a whole) are equipping themselves with immensely powerful SAM’s such as S-300 and S-400 TMD’s, and the new medium range SA-17’s and upgraded SA-11’s that are finding their way on to the second and thrid world arms-markets.
And then there are the future warplanes, interceptors which in the future may include the entire range of Flankers (Su-27/30/33/35/37) in particular the Super Flanker, and then the Su-40 Bourkut, the newer Mig’s and Fulcrum upgrades. Then there are the Rafale, Gripen and J-10 to think about.

Dare I even go into the issue of future ground and airborne radar technology, which will be able to track and identify an aircraft the size of a B-52 long before it EVER reaches the danger zone?

The world of future air war is going to be a very very dangerous place for an aircraft as big and as slow as the B-52, which will force the USAF to increase the amount of constant SEAD, CAP, ELINT, Tanker and jamming support aircraft required to protect and guide the B-52’s into action. The B-1B’s are also something that must be considered.

Stealth is really a major issue that the US had already planned to take up by increasing their fleet of B-2’s and F-117’s. But there are less than 100 of these aircraft in total – barely a pinprick against a potential enemy the size of China or Iran, each nation having well over 100000 associated prmary and secondary military targets.

I might also add, that both these aircraft have absolutely no known air-defence capability, which I feel, is equally stupid. It is only a matter of time before the enemy will learn to defeat you. The Sebs proved it by bringing down an F-117A with an ageing SA-3 Goa and a modified radar of some sort.

So if these aircraft can be considered vulnerable, then the B-52 certainly must sit in the “very very vulnerable” list of US tactical and strategic aircraft, along with aircraft. They should be really looking towards retirement over the next 10 years…

No replies yet.
Sign in to post a reply