dark light

Help,about the 21630 artillery ship

Now i have to wright a article about the 21630 artillery ship,who can give me some analysis articles for me?? thanks sooooo!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,664

Send private message

By: Gollevainen - 20th March 2008 at 12:38

I think we (once again) hit the obscurdity of trying to use western naval clasifications (wich IMO are out of date anyway) of western naval philosophy into a russian ship of russian naval thinking.
Best classification of this vessel would be honest Gun-boat as in Russian thinking it isn’t SRK, nor MPK.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,730

Send private message

By: sealordlawrence - 18th March 2008 at 21:22

You forget that Russians actually care about littirial combat and coastal defences. Fast and nimble, and with shallow draugth these ships would be quite effective in low intensety conflicts along russian shore line, lot more usefull than some DDG-21s . Also i have understood these ships serve in border guard, and knowing Russians tendensies in that area, I only see this class a logical follow on from Pauk and Svetlak desings.

Exactly, these are border patrol patrol vessels. Certainly not FAC’s, just well armed police ships really. Maybe better compared to USCG cutters?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

720

Send private message

By: TinWing - 18th March 2008 at 20:45

You forget that Russians actually care about littirial combat and coastal defences. Fast and nimble, and with shallow draugth these ships would be quite effective in low intensety conflicts along russian shore line, lot more usefull than some DDG-21s . Also i have understood these ships serve in border guard, and knowing Russians tendensies in that area, I only see this class a logical follow on from Pauk and Svetlak desings.

Indeed, these ships are comparable in size to the Pauk/Tarantul, large for a fast attack craft, but rather small to be termed “corvettes.”

Perhaps the term “artillery ship” is better translated as “gun boat?”

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

746

Send private message

By: snake65 - 18th March 2008 at 08:55

The class name is MAK – small artillery ship, on par with MPK and MRK (anti-sub and anti-ship). It’s designed to be the artillery/MLRS component for littoral combat (Russian term is – guarding the region of waters 🙂 ). There’s no reason to put longer ranged weapons on them as they will have to depend on their own sensors for targeting (or those of a small landing force).

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,664

Send private message

By: Gollevainen - 18th March 2008 at 08:42

IMO the ships wont be too useful. too few grad to be useful (8 iirc)… and what the ship for ? bombarding enemy coastal ? ships are too small to cross the ocean. Bombarding their own motherland ? (the special part called chechnya and such ?)… they might frozen in winter river and became sitting duck

You forget that Russians actually care about littirial combat and coastal defences. Fast and nimble, and with shallow draugth these ships would be quite effective in low intensety conflicts along russian shore line, lot more usefull than some DDG-21s . Also i have understood these ships serve in border guard, and knowing Russians tendensies in that area, I only see this class a logical follow on from Pauk and Svetlak desings.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

266

Send private message

By: rsetiawan - 18th March 2008 at 07:50

IMO the ships wont be too useful. too few grad to be useful (8 iirc)… and what the ship for ? bombarding enemy coastal ? ships are too small to cross the ocean. Bombarding their own motherland ? (the special part called chechnya and such ?)… they might frozen in winter river and became sitting duck.

I like the idea of artillery warship but plz put it on serious platform plus…
They should put 1-2 batteries of extended range smerch….:dev2:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,544

Send private message

By: Wanshan - 16th March 2008 at 16:25

do search!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10

Send private message

By: linghongyi - 16th March 2008 at 03:31

wait answer!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10

Send private message

By: linghongyi - 11th March 2008 at 04:01

http://warfare.ru/?linkid=2553&catid=271

Basic specs here

can you find some more analysis about this ship?thanks

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,544

Send private message

By: Wanshan - 10th March 2008 at 18:21

Now i have to wright a article about the 21630 artillery ship,who can give me some analysis articles for me?? thanks sooooo!

Google “project 21630” and “ship”. Other search terms to use are: Makhachkala Astrakhan and Almaz

Go forth and do your research!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,693

Send private message

By: jbritchford - 10th March 2008 at 10:39

http://warfare.ru/?linkid=2553&catid=271

Basic specs here

Sign in to post a reply