dark light

  • Saturn5

Photos of a sinkex

Turkish Navy fired a Harpoon missile during an exercise on East Med on 4 May 2005. The target was the decommissioned Knox frigate Kocatepe.

http://xs41.xs.to/pics/05322/tnharpoonex1.jpg

http://xs41.xs.to/pics/05322/tnharpoonex2.jpg

http://xs41.xs.to/pics/05322/tnharpoonex3.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,704

Send private message

By: dionis - 20th August 2005 at 00:05

imagine an SS-N-19 hit that ship 😐

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

48

Send private message

By: Saturn5 - 17th August 2005 at 13:20

The Sea Zenith mounts can elevate +127 deg., which is makes it very effective against ASuW missiles that pop-up in the terminal phase.

CHARACTERISTICS<br />
Weight<br />
search radar module<br />
antenna group 1,146 lb (520 kg)<br />
below decks 3,175 lb (1,440 kg)<br />
tracking module<br />
mount 2,976 lb (1,350 kg)<br />
below decks 4,079 lb (1,850 kg)<br />
gun mount<br />
above deck 9,700 lb (4,400 kg)<br />
below decks 5,930 lb (2,690 kg)<br />
Dimensions<br />
search radar module<br />
width 8 ft 6 1/2 in (2.60 m)<br />
depth 4 ft 9 1/2 in (1.46 m)<br />
height 6 ft 9 1/2 in (2.07 m)<br />
tracking module<br />
width 6 ft 9 1/2 in (2.07 m)<br />
depth 6 ft 4 in (1.93 m)<br />
height 6 ft 9 in (2.06 m)<br />
gun mount<br />
width 8 ft 5 in (2.57 m)<br />
depth 11 ft 3 in (3.44 m)<br />
height<br />
max above deck (depending on mount)<br />
0 elevation 8 ft 5 in (2.57 m)<br />
zenith elevation<br />
14 ft 6 in (4.42 m)<br />
below deck area 102.3 sq ft (9.5 sq m)<br />
Armament<br />
bore 25 mm/92-cal, rifled<br />
barrel length without muzzle brake<br />
7 ft 5 1/2 in (2.30 m)<br />
recoil length<br />
forward 0.43 in (11 mm)<br />
backward 1.34 in (34 mm)<br />
elevation -14/+127 deg<br />
speed 2.5 rad/sec<br />
acceleration 10 rad/sec<br />
traverse 170 deg to each side<br />
speed 2.5 rad/sec<br />
acceleration 10 rad/sec<br />
Performance<br />
rate of fire 3,400 rpm, maximum<br />
muzzle velocity<br />
AMDS 4,445 fps (1,355 mps)<br />
HEI, TP 3,806 fps (1,160 mps)<br />
time of flight to 1,093 yds (1,000 m)<br />
AMDS 0.78 sec<br />
time of flight to 2,187 yds (2,000 m)<br />
HEI 2.4 sec<br />
max effective range 1,640 yds (1,500 m)<br />
ammunition system capacity<br />
1,660 rounds<br />
AMDS projectile<br />
weight 5.5 oz (156 g)<br />
length 11.3 in (288 mm)<br />
Fire Control<br />
G-band (5.4-5.9 GHz) dual-beam search radar<br />
peak power 49 kW<br />
max gain<br />
low beam 29.5 dB<br />
high beam 26 dB<br />
rotation rate 60 rpm<br />
J-band (15.7-17.5 GHz) tracking radar,<br />
peak power 85 kW<br />
beam width 19 mrad<br />
FLIR<br />
spectral waveband 8 to 13 microns<br />
field of view 3 by 2 deg<br />
Nd:YAG laser rangefinder<br />
spectral waveband 1.06 microns<br />
pulse length 13 nanoseconds<br />
Protection<br />
unmanned mount

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,544

Send private message

By: Wanshan - 14th August 2005 at 00:46

Well neither is the Standard Phalanx that they have mounted on top of the hanger currently 😉

Besides the Sea Zen’s have a much superior field of fire.

If mounted in the same spot, yes. But not if mounted in front of the bridge.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,544

Send private message

By: Wanshan - 14th August 2005 at 00:46

Who manufactures the sea zen?

Oerlikon-Contraves

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,730

Send private message

By: sealordlawrence - 13th August 2005 at 19:06

Who manufactures the sea zen?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,659

Send private message

By: Ja Worsley - 13th August 2005 at 18:31

Well neither is the Standard Phalanx that they have mounted on top of the hanger currently 😉

Besides the Sea Zen’s have a much superior field of fire.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,544

Send private message

By: Wanshan - 13th August 2005 at 18:01

Look at the aft of that ship, man thos Sea Zens are good, makes me wonder why our Anzacs never got them 🙁 They were originally supposed to, one forward where we now have the Harpoon cannisters.

Major close-in fire power from those quad 25mm KBB mounts with hemispherical coverage. But, from the view point of coverage, just 1 forward would clearly not have been enough for the ANZACs.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,659

Send private message

By: Ja Worsley - 13th August 2005 at 03:53

Look at the aft of that ship, man thos Sea Zens are good, makes me wonder why our Anzacs never got them 🙁 They were originally supposed to, one forward where we now have the Harpoon cannisters.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

81

Send private message

By: Forestin - 11th August 2005 at 20:43

Well, here are a LOT of pics of Sinkex arround the world
http://images.google.com/images?q=sinkex&hl=en&btnG=Search+Images

I only hope we get to see some pics soon of the Sinkex of the USS America CV

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

252

Send private message

By: wd1 - 11th August 2005 at 16:21

spectacular!

while many nowadays scoff at harpoon’s puny power compared to bigass stuff like Brahmos and Sunburn, let us not forget good ol’ RGM-84 is still a killer!

i hope no people or fishes were harmed in the course of this exercise.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,544

Send private message

By: Wanshan - 11th August 2005 at 12:54

Do the Knox ships have an aluminium superstructure by any chance? Or is the damage to the bridge purely blast damage? Look at that ASROC launcher, torn right off of its base!

Sign in to post a reply