dark light

  • Austin

Indian Submarine Battle : Scorpene vs U-214

[color=red] Scorpene In Rough Sea[/color]

German class 214 submarine enters the fray with a hard to resist offer
FORCE May-2005
By Prasun K. Sengupta

The ‘almost done deal’ for acquiring six Scorpene-class diesel-electric submarines (SSK) worth almost US$2 billion for the Indian Navy now certainly appears to be in jeopardy, as the German Submarine Consortium (GSC) last month made a hard-to-refuse offer for supplying an equal number of Type 214 SSKs along with a related package for upgrading the navy’s existing four Class 209/Type 1500 SSKs that were acquired from the GSC in the 1980s. To make the offer extremely attractive, GSC has proposed the following:

The Type 214 SSKs are being offered at prices 30 per cent cheaper than the Scorpenes.

State-owned, Mumbai-based Mazagon Docks (MDL), which has so far licence-built two Class 209/Type 1500 SSKs, will be trained and equipped by the GSC to licence-build the Type 214s within a six-month period following contract signature.

GSC will have an industrial tie-up with MDL to enable the latter to independently undertake the mid-life refits of the navy’s existing four Class 209/Type 1500 SSKs that will include the installation of self-contained ‘hull modules’ that will house fuel-cell-based air-independent propulsion (AIP) systems similar to the ones on board the Class 214 SSK.

GSC will give the navy total flexibility to choose, install and integrate the Type 214 SSK’s combat management system; guided-weapons; optronic periscopes; tactical data links; SATCOM and VLF communications suites; search radar; electronic warfare (EW) suite; and the sonar suite that will include a cylindrical array sonar for medium-frequency passive detection, flank array sonar for low/medium-frequency detection, thin line active/passive towed-array for low-frequency determination of target range and bearing of hostile submarines, an intercept array sonar for detection of active emissions of surface warships, and an active high-frequency mine detection sonar.

http://www.forceindia.net/images/scropeneinroughsea.jpg

It is believed that India’s Ministry of Defence (MoD) is favourably disposed to GSC’s offer due to the following reasons:

Unlike the Scorpene, which is equipped and armed with sensors and systems made only by France (by Armaris, THALES, SAGEM and MBDA) and Spain (IZAR), the Type 214 SSK is being offered with a choice of weapons and sensors from different countries. This means the SSK will be able to fire the Russian Novator-built 3M54E Klub-S supersonic anti-ship cruise missile (ASCM) and its 3M-14E land-attack variant, which is well-liked by the navy and is currently operational with at least four of the navy’s upgraded Type 877EKM Kilo-class SSKs.

The Scorpene SSK, although ordered by Chile (two) and Malaysia (two), does not yet have an operational AIP system. Armaris is still developing the steam turbine-based ‘MESMA’ (Module d’Energie Sous-Marine Autonome) AIP system, which basically burns ethanol and liquid oxygen to make the steam needed to drive a turbo-electric generator. In contrast, the fuel-cell-based AIP system developed by the GSC and Siemens is currently operational with the navies of Germany and Italy.

GSC’s offer of ‘helping enable’ MDL to upgrade in-country the navy’s four 1,850-ton Class 209/Type 1500 SSKs, which will approach the end of their operational lives between 2016 and 2024, is something Armaris of France cannot match. The navy too regards the mid-life upgrade of these four SSKs an operational necessity.

The fuel-cell-based AIP system of the Class 214 SSK is similar in design and operating concept to the Kristall-27E AIP of the Russian Amur 1650-class SSK, six of which will be licence-built for the navy by Larsen & Toubro Ltd and be armed with BrahMos vertically-launched, multi-role supersonic cruise missiles (see FORCE November 2004, page 22). This will help greatly reduce the life-cycle costs of both the Type 214 and the Amur 1650 SSK fleets.

The Type 214 SSK is derived from the Type 212 SSK, four of which have begun entering service with the German Navy and were built by Howaldtswerke-Deutsche Werft GmbH (HDW) of Kiel and Thyssen Nordseewerke GmbH (TNSW) of Enden, both members of the GSC. The two Type 212s ordered by the Italian Navy are being licence-built by Fincantieri. The Greek Navy has ordered four Type 214 SSKs, while South Korea has ordered three Type 214 SSKs that are being licence-built by Hyundai Heavy Industries.

The Type 214 has an increased diving depth of more than 400 metres (more than 1,400 feet), compared to the Scorpene’s 300 metres. Its hull length is 65 metres and displacement is 1,700 tonnes. Built of austenitic steel (HY-80 and HY-100), the SSK’s buoyancy reserve is in excess of 10 per cent. Four of its eight torpedo launch tubes (equipped with a water ram expulsion system) are capable of firing ASCMs. Heavyweight torpedoes used by the Type 214 SSK include the Whitehead Alenia Sistemi Subaquei-built Black Shark or STN Atlas’ DM2A4 dual purpose, wire-guided heavy torpedo.

Propulsion is provided by two MTU-built 16V396 diesel-electric engines (2,000 kW) serving a 600-900V propulsion battery with a fully integrated auxiliary AIP system based on two PEM (polymer electrolyte membrane) 120kW fuel-cell modules. The propulsion motor is a Siemens Permasyn (Type FR6439-3900KW) low-speed permanently excited electric motor driving a low-noise, skewback 7-blade propeller. Using the AIP system on submerged patrol and intercept missions enables the Type 214 SSK to remain submerged for up to 13 days at a speed of 4 Knots. Submerged sprint speeds of between 16 and 20+ Knots are possible for periods of a few hours several times during a 50-day mission. At a speed of 6 Knots the mission range is almost 12,000nm, while the maximum endurance is 84 days.

The navy’s Class 209/Type 1500 SSKs were ordered on 11 December 1981. The first two SSKs (S-44 Shishumar and S-45 Shankush) were built by HDW and were inducted into service on 22 September and 20 November 1986, respectively. The remaining two (S-46 Shalki and S-47 Shankul) were licence-built by MDL and entered service on 7 February 1992 and 28 May 1994.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,552

Send private message

By: Austin - 4th September 2005 at 06:00

As far as AIP goes , The IN has chosen the German Fuel Cells over French MESMA , An internal study of the IN came up with the conclusion that the German Fuel Cells were much superior to the French MESMA.

One never knows how urgent is this AIP requirement wheather they would incorporated with the first sub itself and would be fitted on a later one.

One thing about the French Scorpene is that all the command & control ,sensors sonar and weapons suite ,SUBTICS are made by France so it would be much easier to transfer the tech as part of the deal.

Also one grey area is what specification has the IN asked for , the Scorpene is a very customizable submarine and cost could vary depending on whats fitted and customised in the sub

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,730

Send private message

By: sealordlawrence - 3rd September 2005 at 23:11

But AIP is an upgrade to the scorpene, and its not an urgent requirement for the IN. Again, which has the best sensor suite and which is the quietest when running on diesels.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

183

Send private message

By: Cliff Barnes - 3rd September 2005 at 22:50

This can’t be a tough decision.

U-214 is coming with an AIP from start, and they do know how to make AIPs. Kockums, which had the first kind of AIP system operational on the Gotland class submarines way back in 1996 has recently sold sterling engines to the japanese subs (if I’m not completely mistaken). GSC offers fuel cells, and they have ’em operational on italian and german subs. Kockums is a part of GSC, so they have two different AIP systems operational and ready to sell. How many have the french, and how much experience do they have? Zero.

Before any smartass tries to say that AIP isn’t all that important;
go ask the french how they performed in combat duels against the swedish AIP submarine Halland a couple of years ago. Hint: Halland didn’t loose one single duel.

(Source: http://www.mil.se/index.php?lang=S&c=news&id=884 in swedish)

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,730

Send private message

By: sealordlawrence - 3rd September 2005 at 18:58

I would hate to have to make this decision, I mean it is not just about the raw performances listed in the Articles above, when it comes to submarines one has to take into account the noise each makes aswell as the relative sensor and communications fits. But I envy the IN for being in position to be able to choose.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,552

Send private message

By: Austin - 1st September 2005 at 12:12

Request for proposal for construction of two submarines Mazagon Dock Ltd. Mumbai initially was issued to four firms in 1997, out of which only one firm has responded.

Isnt It strange that just one responded.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,552

Send private message

By: Austin - 1st September 2005 at 12:10

I dont forsee they would go for U-214/212 without annoying a lot of people.

First The Navy , It would delay sub program by atleast 2 years( inspite of tall claims made by HDW ) , Procurement is a long drawn up process and the whole things needs to be retendered and reevaluated by the Navy, MOF , MOD and Finally CCS.
And Navy feels that with Scorpene they are getting the best sub ( technically atleast)

Second France who has been waiting for tooo long and has been getting impatient as seen by statement by its ambassador , They now feel that both the Mirage deal aka MMRCA and Project 75 is a never ending process.

The bottom line is Money, India want to get what it wants with the lowest possible price and France wants to sell the best it has at a premium , And every thing that happens in bewteen is plain manouvering and Pysops by both countries.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4

Send private message

By: ROetter - 1st September 2005 at 04:17

Procurement of Submarines

(Source: Indian Ministry of Defence; dated Aug. 25, web-posted Aug. 30, 2005)

NEW DELHI — Request for proposal for construction of two submarines Mazagon Dock Ltd. Mumbai initially was issued to four firms in 1997, out of which only one firm has responded. Subsequently, it was decided to negotiate for indigenous construction of six submarines under transfer of technology from the French company. No final decision has, however, been taken by the Government in this regard.

This information was given by the Defence Minister Shri Pranab Mukherjee in a written reply to Dr. Rajesh Mishra and others in Lok Sabha today.

-ends-

I copied this news tit-bit from defence-aerospace website

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,552

Send private message

By: Austin - 1st September 2005 at 03:49

India Close To Acquiring Scorpene Submarine

NEW DELHI, AUG 29: India is expected to clear the way for the purchase of six ‘Scorpene’ submarines from French companies DCN and Thales.

Senior officials told FE that the Cabinet would clear the $2 billion deal shortly as a prelude to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s three-day visit to France from September 11, on his way to New York next month.

The submarines will be built at the state-owned Mazagon dockyard in Mumbai, with technical assistance and equipment from French companies. The submarines are to be delivered between 2010 and 2015. As part of the deal, the submarines would be armed with EADS SM-39 Exocet anti-ship missiles.

However, Naval headquarters is worried that its fleet, “particularly the submarine strike arm”, was de-commissioning vessels faster than it can acquire them. “We have waited long, too long actually,” said the chief of naval staff, Admiral Arun Prakash, when asked about the proposal to acquire the Scorpene submarines.

The Cabinet committee on security is expected to meet later this week to discuss the proposal on Scorpene submarines, that had been cleared by naval headquarters nearly a year back. India has been in negotiations with France to acquire and jointly develop six 1,500-tonne Scorpene submarines at the Mazagon docks.

Sources in the defence ministry said that there has been indication that the deal had currently been put on hold due to comments of the French ambassador in India, Dominique Girard, on the Airbus deal.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

6

Send private message

By: Anthrax_cat - 1st September 2005 at 02:33

If Russian weapon systems are really made available for use on the 214 then its almost certainly a winner. The Indians put a considerable amount of pressure on the French to joint build the Scorpenes with Klub missile capabilities, which ended when only 6 units were to be aquired. This move is so sweet for the Indian interests it’s almost too good to be true! My knee-jerk reaction is that the Indian scorpene project is now dead.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,140

Send private message

By: Blackcat - 28th May 2005 at 17:24

I hope the mods can merge this thread into Indian Submarine Competition thread.

Austin, hope u don mind, TY.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

488

Send private message

By: cinciboy - 19th May 2005 at 13:33

Well the german offer is hard to refuse the price is really low considering that India would get not only some nice new subs but also an upgrade (including the same AIP system) for their Type 209s.
I just don’t know why HDW makes such an offer. There are a lot of navies who would buy these subs even without such a ‘generous’ deal. :confused: 😉

The deal is more to do with politics than commercial. 😀

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

6

Send private message

By: Mastkiller - 18th May 2005 at 21:30

Well the german offer is hard to refuse the price is really low considering that India would get not only some nice new subs but also an upgrade (including the same AIP system) for their Type 209s.
I just don’t know why HDW makes such an offer. There are a lot of navies who would buy these subs even without such a ‘generous’ deal. :confused: 😉

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,552

Send private message

By: Austin - 18th May 2005 at 18:42

Ja Its possible 2 Akula but not four , the Possibility was confirmed by CNS in an interview to FORCE.

To be fair here well Boeing won on its merit also the file has been sent to CAG for further checks , just as they did with the Airbus deal with Indian Airlines ,so on face of it the Air India looks on its merit.

looking at the state of our International airport , I wonder even the if the Boing 777 is worth here, our Infra at Intl Airport is pathetic , also if we go for A-380 we would require major changes in existing infrastructure at the airport which I dun see happening in the next 2 decades.

Before buying these large A/C they should first massively upgrade the infra .

France will be pinched badly if they loose the Scorpene and Mirage deal , But India also knows the fact that if they intentionall try to put down france ( who supported India during N-Blast and prevented sanctions etc ) France would make the going difficult by selling Scorpene and Mirages to France.

As to why not the U-214 , well the U-214 has no missile to offer of its own , and even the Combat management system is from a third country , with Scorpene India gets the TOT for SUBTICS and will also get the Block-3 Exocet , perhaps future Naval SCALP.

Most Important is the present CNS statement that the U Boats were considered along with the Scorpene and Scorpene was selected over U boats on technical grounds , But later on IN will fit the MESMA on the Scorpene

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,038

Send private message

By: Distiller - 18th May 2005 at 17:26

This may have something to do with Airbus’ VP Nigel Harwood’s recent impertinence regarding Air India’s decision not to sign for the A380.
Airbus is (rightly) viewed as a French company, so when the French spun too hard, India decided to hurt them by including the Germans in the submarine programme.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

326

Send private message

By: xanadu - 18th May 2005 at 08:42

From where this number of four akulas come from? I thought it was just two.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,659

Send private message

By: Ja Worsley - 15th May 2005 at 13:53

Exactly what i said to him in a chat 😉

Interesting that the Germans are offering the fuelcell right from day one where as the French are offering it as an upgrade later on.

What I would like to know is how is the IN plans for procurement of the four Akula class subs going?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

488

Send private message

By: Rob L - 14th May 2005 at 07:43

I hope the U214 will win, the Germans build the best smallish submarines. 🙂

Sign in to post a reply