January 19, 2008 at 5:39 am
Raytheon Teams With US Navy and NASA for First-of-its-Kind Rolling Airframe Missile Wind Tunnel Test
TUCSON, Ariz. — Raytheon Company, partnering with the U.S. Navy and NASA, has successfully completed an innovative wind tunnel test of the company’s Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM) Block 2.
Performed at the NASA Ames Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel facility in California, the exercise collected more than 500 gigabytes of aerodynamic data during 164 wind tunnel test hours that spanned four-and-a-half weeks.
The RAM Block 2 system design and development program is primarily a kinematic upgrade to the missile that requires a new four-axis independent control actuator system, as well as a new boost-sustain rocket motor with approximately twice the propellant as the previous motor. As a result of these significant improvements, the aerodynamic properties of the Block 2 missile necessitate very thorough analysis in order to extract maximum performance.
Conceptualization of this innovative test began nearly two years ago. The RAM Block 2 development program required aerodynamic data over a range of Mach numbers and at missile rotational speeds of up to 15 Hertz (cycles per second). To meet these requirements, a new, fully operational 75 percent spinning missile model was developed by Raytheon, with support from the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division in China Lake, Calif. The model incorporated a rotating six-component balance, as well as a full complement of instrumentation to monitor time and space critical events.
Other features of the new wind tunnel model included complex on-board electronics, a custom high-speed data acquisition system, high-rate canard actuators capable of deflecting the canards at rates of 1500 degrees per second, and high-performance canard and roll control systems.
“The testing program highlighted the abilities of the Navy, Raytheon Missile Systems and NASA to effectively partner on this very complicated testing program and deliver what would have been previously unobtainable data,” said Don Nickison, chief of the NASA Ames Wind Tunnel operations division.
For the test, NASA’s Ames group dedicated an entire preparation area and crew, who worked six days a week for more than 13 weeks in preparation. Once begun, the testing occurred in the facility’s supersonic and transonic wind tunnels.
The company-produced, one-of-kind data acquisition system and model interfaced with the Ames’ computer systems to provide important tunnel facility safety interlocks. The data acquired was then transferred to the NASA server for post-processing.
“This is the most technically advanced dynamic force and movement wind tunnel test system to date,” said Frank Wyatt, Raytheon Missile Systems vice president of Naval Weapon Systems. “Raytheon and NASA have set the new standard for this technology. None of this would have been possible had it not been for the outstanding efforts of the NASA staff.”
Ames built and programmed a custom computer system for post-processing of the data, along with other interfaces between the model and facility systems.
Raytheon Company, with 2006 sales of $19.7 billion, is a technology leader specializing in defense, homeland security and other government markets throughout the world. With headquarters in Waltham, Mass., Raytheon employs 72,000 people worldwide.
By: sferrin - 27th August 2008 at 03:37
That’s a good question. Is the bigger motor designed to improve speed, range, or both?
And yeah, the article mentions that it still spins.
The thing I don’t get is why, with it’s PK in testing and simplicity, they don’t stick them on the later Burkes where the Phalanxs used to be. Other countries are doing something similar, why not the US? Yes, I’m aware of ESSM but the thing about RAM is it’s not dependent on illumination so they can just hose those babies off in a saturation attack without tying up the radar. Sounds like a case of jumping over a dollar to save a dime to me. :confused:
By: YourFather - 27th August 2008 at 03:30
Does anybody have any idea how the performance of RAM Block 2 compares with the original RAM missile?
Increase in motor diameter will be from 5 to 6.25 inches, necessitating slight mods to the launch canister. Only software mods needed for launcher. Expected performance increases will be 50% increase in effective range and 3 times the maneuverability of earlier RAM.
By: SOC - 27th August 2008 at 02:11
That’s a good question. Is the bigger motor designed to improve speed, range, or both?
And yeah, the article mentions that it still spins.
By: d'clacy - 27th August 2008 at 01:49
Does anybody have any idea how the performance of RAM Block 2 compares with the original RAM missile?
By: mabie - 19th January 2008 at 22:34
RAM (Rolling Airframe Missile) has two canards and a rifled launch tube which spins the missile. The two canards are used as rudder or elevators as required.
RAM Block 2 has 4 fins and the plan is to remove the helical lands (rifling from the launcher).
So will RAM Block 2 still roll? If not, then they’ll have to give it a new name, right?:D
By: Peter G - 19th January 2008 at 08:01
RAM (Rolling Airframe Missile) has two canards and a rifled launch tube which spins the missile. The two canards are used as rudder or elevators as required.
RAM Block 2 has 4 fins and the plan is to remove the helical lands (rifling from the launcher).
By: Distiller - 19th January 2008 at 06:32
The diameter of the motor doesn’t have to increse sooo much to double the volume. But of course when you want to use existing launcher you have to do something with the wings in the back. I read somewhere the motor has a 5.75″ dia.
By: sferrin - 19th January 2008 at 06:03
If the motor is that much bigger I’m wondering how compatible it’ll be with the current launchers. They don’t seem to be much more than a shell with rails for the launch tubes but. . .:confused:
By: Distiller - 19th January 2008 at 05:50
Yip, read it. Was looking for a picture but couldn’t find none.