dark light

Canon EF 90-300MM NON USM

Hi there,

I was just wondering if this a good lens for aviation photography…it is featured in the following bundle…

http://www.pcworld.co.uk/product.php?sku=342706&camp_id=kelkoo_search

Does the fact that it is non USM take anything away from it?? Am I being ripped-off if I get this bundle??

Thanks for any advise 🙂
PW

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

377

Send private message

By: Jur - 18th August 2006 at 12:50

You could consider to get a zoom in that range from Sigma, Tokina or Tamron. Although more expensive, I know that the Sigma HSM 4/100-300 is an excellent performer and very well built. Anyway I would strongly advise to buy the best glass possible within your reach and, if necessary, to save up a bit longer. The so-called kit lenses often are rather weak performers and/or not the best in mechanical quality. More often than not you’ll eventually want a better lens anyway.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

133

Send private message

By: pilotwannabe - 15th August 2006 at 18:44

Oh dear 😡 …thanks Jur, i’ve decided not too go with that bundle.

Do you or anyone else have any suggestions as to a good telephoto lens compatible with the 350D. My budget is £150-£200.

Thanks

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

377

Send private message

By: Jur - 15th August 2006 at 11:03

PW
As a Nikon man I don’t have any experiences with this lens. A quick search on the Dpreview site ( http://www.dpreview.com/ ) learned me that the quality of the 90-300 non USM is rather questionable.

Quote: “The 90-300mm has probably the worst build quality of any Canon lens. The IQ is quite good and the focus fast but it looks like it is about to fall apart at the slightest knock. After using it for a couple of weeks I was glad to sell it even at a considerable loss.”

Just go to the Canon SLR lens forum on that site and do a search on 90-300 to get many opinions. Hope this helps.

Sign in to post a reply