dark light

"Cut here in emergency"

Technical question here ? I am sure we have all seen this label attached to specific areas on most aircraft ??
My question is …. what makes the outlined area the prefered area to cut in an emergency ??
Is it a weaker area especialy built in to allow easier cutting …. cutting with what ??? …. firefighters axe …. ??
Is it selected because there are less obstructions within the skin of the airframe, stringers, frames, pipework, cables etc ….. ?
Is it selected because there are less obstructions within the cabin, seats, toilets, cabin fixtures in that area …. ??
I know nothing !! Over to those who do ??

Keith.

http://i261.photobucket.com/albums/ii58/keithnewsome/DSC_0118-1.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

53

Send private message

By: lancastermkx - 26th October 2010 at 20:40

It occurs to me that I don’t know of any accident where cutting along the dotted line was both necessary and possible.
Has anyone ever seen it done?

We have tried this with the standard issue fire axe ,,,nigh on impossible ,,even if you get through the outer skin you have hatbins and interior trim to contend with,,even with a petrol cutter in the mayhem of possible leaking fuel and fluids this will be a risky process ,as most of you know i pull apart various airframes with a more than adequate machine and even this struggles sometimes,,

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

119

Send private message

By: forester - 25th October 2010 at 16:00

It occurs to me that I don’t know of any accident where cutting along the dotted line was both necessary and possible.
Has anyone ever seen it done?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

53

Send private message

By: lancastermkx - 24th October 2010 at 14:40

Yes and at Kemble! 😀

Are you Stalking me ,,,,LOL:D

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

53

Send private message

By: lancastermkx - 24th October 2010 at 14:37

“Husquvarna petrol cutter works better,,,,or even a 35ton excavator”

Thanks mate, If you just happen to have one of either in your pocket at the time of the emergency ????
Can I assume from your address and knowledge of the equipment that you attack aircraft on the tarmac at Lasham ?? :diablo: :diablo:

Keith.

Attack is a bit strong ,,,,we like to call it sympathetic airframe disposal (S.A.D) we did a Fokker 100 at Norwich i think around two years ago now.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,315

Send private message

By: bazv - 23rd October 2010 at 14:38

but…..whats wrong with the door beside the cut area? seems a little pointless to put a door next to a cut area, thats just a waste of hinges!

Doors/hatches can be jammed due to Airframe damage/distortion !So just a belt and braces approach to that eventuallity !

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 23rd October 2010 at 10:54

They should fit one of those sardine-can keys just above the “cut here” station and then have the little tab that you slot into the key. Or the more modern technique:

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/98/2006_sardines_can.jpg/800px-2006_sardines_can.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

144

Send private message

By: D.Healey - 22nd October 2010 at 22:49

dont aircraft usually peel themselves open in amergency situations?

the 35 ton excavator might be a bit much especially if you got biggles on the inside with his axe, you know who would lose…..the 35 ton excavator thats who!

but…..whats wrong with the door beside the cut area? seems a little pointless to put a door next to a cut area, thats just a waste of hinges!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

8,156

Send private message

By: Newforest - 22nd October 2010 at 21:47

Yes and at Kemble! 😀

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,802

Send private message

By: keithnewsome - 22nd October 2010 at 21:28

“Husquvarna petrol cutter works better,,,,or even a 35ton excavator”

Thanks mate, If you just happen to have one of either in your pocket at the time of the emergency ????
Can I assume from your address and knowledge of the equipment that you attack aircraft on the tarmac at Lasham ?? :diablo: :diablo:

Keith.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

53

Send private message

By: lancastermkx - 22nd October 2010 at 16:18

Husquvarna petrol cutter works better,,,,or even a 35ton excavator

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,114

Send private message

By: symon - 14th October 2010 at 06:29

I was just going to ask something similar: do the manufacturers have to dedicate an area of the aircraft to have these sections i.e. ensure certain areas are relatively ‘free’ for this purpose? Or are they considered near the end, and decide where to assign the cut-out section later?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

84

Send private message

By: MD-80 - 14th October 2010 at 01:17

I think that such marked areas are mandatory in some countries while in other countries not?

Thanks

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,802

Send private message

By: keithnewsome - 13th October 2010 at 23:45

JT442. Thank you for that well educated sounding answer, and welcome to the forum ! We will look forward to hearing from you in the very near future ! 🙂

Keith.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

870

Send private message

By: JT442 - 13th October 2010 at 23:33

The short answer is ‘yes’

Usually, the area will be free of heavy structure, hydraulic pipelines, air conditioning ducts, etc. A fire axe will go through the skin and stringers with reletively little effort. In my experience, you have to be pretty dedicated to the task to cut a human-sized hole in any aluminium aircraft.

The standard aircraft fire axe (rounded blade, 8″ point on the other end) is a superb multi-use tool. I have cut down trees with mine!

Sign in to post a reply