May 12, 2003 at 1:01 pm
I’m just trying this to see what looks better on screen. Two pics of the same thing, one scanned from the photo print and one from the free CD-ROM from Boots. If the ROM looks better I’ll use that system in future.
By: Ren Frew - 12th May 2003 at 17:55
Ryanair at PIK, very common sight down there now…
By: Ren Frew - 12th May 2003 at 17:53
Thanks for the film scanner info T5, I was expecting to pay about £300 for one so that info is useful. Have you got anything you could show on here out of interest ?
Here’s another 2 from PIK and CD-ROM
By: T5 - 12th May 2003 at 17:09
I would have said the first was the better one. When you scan the photo in, that’s gone from negative to paper and then scanned in. With the CD, it’s negative and scanner, no paper whatsoever, so you don’t lose much (if any) of the quality.
Film scanners are great, I’ve got a Microtek Filmscan 35, it’s only £130 (about the cheapest available) and is also available, exactly the same model, under the Jessops brand but at £10 less. I find colour negatives and slide (positive film) extremely easy to scan but black and white is extremely hard and requires patience!
By: Ren Frew - 12th May 2003 at 15:52
Top one is the CD-ROM and bottom the scan, you can tell the scan by the little bits of fluff and hairs that got caught on the glass. I’m off again to Boots to get my other Prestwick stuff onto CD-ROM. Hopefully by late summer I’ll have my own neg scanner and better lenses.
Until then it’s the Spain trip which I’ll be picture posting next week when I return.
By: Hand87_5 - 12th May 2003 at 15:21
Contrast loks a bit better on the first one
By: A330Crazy - 12th May 2003 at 15:19
I’d say the second one is the better quality… the titles on the aircraft are bolder and are more clear.
I’d guess the first being the scan and the secone the CD?
By: petertenthije - 12th May 2003 at 14:19
The top one is best, I think that is the one you scanned yourself.
By: Ren Frew - 12th May 2003 at 13:07
Can you tell which is which ?