March 25, 2003 at 6:49 pm
..I cannot think of a single good reason why the RAF should not have to register their aircraft as G-xxxx.
Are they exempt from an AOC?
Also it appears that round the world, militaries are treated differently. Why?
By: Ren Frew - 26th March 2003 at 10:33
I wa arranging a filming stint in an RAF Bulldog trainer and also had to arrange personal insurance as the RAF has none.
By: wysiwyg - 26th March 2003 at 07:38
…and as a point of interest British (and probably other nations too) military pilots do not even hold licenses! Unless they chose to go out individually at their own cost and get a civilian license they are not allowed to rent a club Cessna!
By: Hand87_5 - 25th March 2003 at 19:25
Originally posted by galdri
However there is a clause in the Chicago Convention stating “military aircraft shall however show due consideration to civil airtransport”
A friend of mine is ATC at ORY.
All what I can tell is that military don’t give a damn sh*t about civil airtransport.
By: mongu - 25th March 2003 at 19:12
Yes, thanks, it clarifies the legal basis.
By: galdri - 25th March 2003 at 19:08
Hello mongu,
All military aircraft are what is called a “state aircraft” according to the ICAO classification. The reason they are not registered like normal aircraft is the fact that they are exemt from all airworthiness requirements and do not have to conform to International Air Law in their operation. This means they can do what ever they like and are not bound by normal air law. However there is a clause in the Chicago Convention stating “military aircraft shall however show due consideration to civil airtransport”
NO military has an AOC. AOC stands for Air Operators Certificate. Only companies engaged in Civil Air Transport Operations have an AOC. To get an AOC you have to meet stringent rules and are monitored by the local CAA. Stringent rules and monitoring are the last thing any military wants.
Hope this answears your question.