Typical Garry. No source no matter what it is has any crediblity? Not even the people who RAN the friggin’ test huh?

Good old Sferrin… not listening. As I said before unless I was reading stuff directly from Dr Whos Tardis those reports refer to a test dated later than when I read the reports hense these reports might be 100% accurate but they don’t refer to the tests I am talking about.

Now, if the SA-5 only accelerated it all up to Mach 5 and the scramjet accelerated to above Mach 6 without the SA-5 detaching how did the SA-5 get to Mach 6+ unless the scramjet was the one that did it?

Seems you are assuming I meant the SA-5 accelerated to mach 5 and then stopped operating, and then the Scramjet started up and accelerated the whole thing on its own to mach 6. Your mistake. I forgive you, and won’t even abuse you for your stupidity. I am nice like that sometimes.

Nobody is buying your story and your claim of admitting fault when presented with it is equally bogus. But at least it’s good to know that some things never change right?

The only point in admitting to being wrong is in open honest discussions without personal attacks is to make those dicussions free and fair. THat allows real conclusions to be made. The only conclusions talking to you willg et is that Russia is evil, the US is perfect etc etc. Equally to admit I am wrong when discussing things with you is to admit I am painting myself into corners. another reason not to make admitions because it is not true. When discussing things with reasonable people I will happily admit when I am wrong. Particularly when they actually make sense with real information and don’t make people who are mistaken feel like a fool by telling them they are such.