I particularly liked 8 and 15, but didn’t have any problems with any of them myself, how about you.?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/goodlife/11599473/15-banned-advertisements.html?frame=2636802
By: paul1867 - 14th May 2015 at 10:37
Somehow these had passed me by so thanks, I don’t think this covers to which you refer though, A & M which had also passed me by until the “Humour” thread. Must get out more.
By: charliehunt - 14th May 2015 at 09:10
Quite so!;)
By: adrian_gray - 14th May 2015 at 09:04
It is not unknown for an agency to launch a campaign knowing that it will be objected to. By the time the process has run there will be all the normal exposure and the added PR from its ‘banning’.
Or, to describe this in three words, “Shepherd Neame – Spitfire”. I’m sure you all know what I mean…
Adrian
By: Moggy C - 14th May 2015 at 07:47
Particularly for ‘youth’ brands an element of kicking against ‘The Establishment’ is not unwelcome.
Moggy
By: charliehunt - 14th May 2015 at 07:43
Generally “any publicity is good publicity” is a truism, I imagine.
By: Moggy C - 14th May 2015 at 07:20
It is not unknown for an agency to launch a campaign knowing that it will be objected to. By the time the process has run there will be all the normal exposure and the added PR from its ‘banning’.
When the findings are for the complaint, the agency apologises and promises never to run that campaign again.
Win Win
Moggy
By: charliehunt - 14th May 2015 at 06:00
None at all with most and some were very amusing but we know how little sense of humour our “thought police” possess!!;)
Sign In
May 14, 2015 at 12:56 am