By: charliehunt - 25th June 2013 at 08:29
The only difference as Nik Wallenda put it so succinctly – he’d have 9 seconds to think about it as he fell – a lot less from 100 feet.
By: hampden98 - 24th June 2013 at 20:34
You have to admit he’s got some bottle. But it’s all relative. Fall at 100, fall at 1500. Same outcome.
Did you see the program about the guy who did it between the twin towers. That was pretty awesome too.
By: charliehunt - 24th June 2013 at 10:49
His grandfather, Karl, died walking a tightrope at the age of 73, I think and only fell because the ropes and guys etc were poorly effected and not overseen by the family. So perhaps he has a few more years yet….
By: trumper - 24th June 2013 at 10:41
Bonkers,makes me feel ill just looking at it.It is another case where there is only ever in time going to be one outcome,old age won’t be it unless he retires.
Sign In
June 24, 2013 at 6:16 am