dark light

Let's talk RN vs RAF.

Well, i’ll keep the story brief.

I recently telephoned the RAF office in Bloomsbury, with regards to joining as an aircraft technician (mechanical). They’re not recruiting at the moment, but I am on a waiting list, and will be contacted in due course. More importantly though, they told me I would need to attain GCSE Maths and Science at grade C before I can hope to apply. (Achieved D and DD in each seven years ago).

So, I’m on the verge of starting some adult evening classes with the aim of taking the gcse exams next spring/summer.

However – it then struck me to check out the other services. The Army require the same as the RAF for you to apply.

I couldn’t believe it when I noticed that the RN will allow you to apply as an aircraft technician with no formal qualifications required – not even the basic maths, english and science.

Now, assuming the Fleet Air Arm still have aircraft to fix in the future (not certain with the current gov’t), obviously I know that basic training will differ between the two services, but how will trade training and service life differ? I’m hoping some of you fine people could bring to the light the differences that an aircraft technician will notice between the two.

If you have personal experiences to share, that would be very helpful. Or if you think I should bide my time, re-take my GCSE’s and hope to be successful with the RAF, please explain why.

I’m really looking for any reason to not join the Navy over the RAF. I know that the standard service is longer, but can’t find much more.

Opinions please!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

558

Send private message

By: topgun regect - 23rd July 2011 at 15:32

Its worth noting that a friend of mine is currently going through selection for the RN in the Comms trade and is have a hell of a time getting a start date just to get into basic training. he was due to go, after passing all the selection criteria and pre-service fitness tests, early 2010. Then, due to the SDR, was put back to October/November 2010, then pushed back to May 2011 and had to do a requal for his fitness tests as the original had expired (they are only valid for 12months) Now he has been told it could be December 2012 before he gets in.

In these times of uncertainty especially with HM Armed Forces, I would say go for it if thats what you want to do. but be prepared for a long wait and have a backup plan if you are unsuccessful. You never know the trade you want may suddenly open up.

Thats what happened to me back in about 1990. I applied for the Royal Air Force as a ‘sooty’, passed the selection phase, just and waited for a callup date as the trade was closed. I went to college to finish a course I started as a YTS apprentice to gain a HNC, then halfway through my final year I got the call to go with about 2 months notice.

Keep your options open

Martin

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

384

Send private message

By: danjama - 21st July 2011 at 20:24

Thanks, Flatcat. 🙂

My English is very good, I got B/B in Lit/Language, and D@A-level. You’re right, I will maybe need those anyway one day. I think I might be entitled to some sort of adult learning grant from the college, will have to look into it.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,569

Send private message

By: BlueRobin - 21st July 2011 at 18:33

You need those GSCEs anyway for civvy street. Perhaps you can them sponsored somehow whilst you go in at a low level/alternative means? Your English seems ok, innit?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

55

Send private message

By: Flatcat - 21st July 2011 at 07:14

I can’t answer definitely but from my experiences if you are in the right place/have the right contacts, at the right time then you will get a chance to work on the new equipment. Remember any place of work, but in particular the military obviously, has a rank structure, and to safely operate all levels of the structure need training on the new equipment. More so the senior members of the structure will get the first lot of training as they have the experience to underpin the training on the new equipment. (not to mention RHIP 😀 )

So as a general rule, the SQN Leaders/FLT LT’s will receive initial training over Pilot and Flying Officers, and WO’s, FLT SGT’s and SGt’s will get training over the baggies.

As hard as it is at this stage you need to look at what you want further in life and also the life style you want. As mentioned the two services provide different lifestyles while you are in the service, while they also will open different doors when you leave. Not an easy choice, but also one that you can’t get too wrong.

ps. The day that you made a poor decision to press on in your bug smasher and now find yourself lying in a clagged in gully hurting in the cold, wet mist you’ll have never seen a more beautiful AIRCRAFT than you fling wing friend with the winch hovering above.:diablo:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

4,704

Send private message

By: ZRX61 - 21st July 2011 at 06:51

I couldn’t believe it when I noticed that the RN will allow you to apply as an aircraft technician with no formal qualifications required – not even the basic maths, english and science.

True, but they do require a higher standard for trainee aircraft techs than they do for pilots, whose only requirement is the ability to walk without dragging your knuckles across the deck….. 😉

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

10,735

Send private message

By: J Boyle - 21st July 2011 at 00:37

Plenty of Helicopters, they are counted as aircraft. 😉

Not in civilised circles.

Moggy

You might feel differently if you were in trouble and on the end of a rescue winch. :diablo:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

384

Send private message

By: danjama - 21st July 2011 at 00:03

You really need to try and talk to people that are doing the same job as you want to do in the respective services at the moment.

You’re right. What I really want to know is – will I have the opportunity to train on the new kit once it’s entered service – i’ve always been more interested in fixed-wing over rotary. A trip to the Careers Office is in order, Monday is the first opportunity. I’ll let you know what they say.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,375

Send private message

By: spitfireman - 20th July 2011 at 18:44

I thought we are only getting one aircraft carrier? the other will only be used as a amphibious assault ship.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article6888962.ece

baz

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,672

Send private message

By: pagen01 - 20th July 2011 at 18:16

I would say that the lifestyle is probably the biggest difference between the two, as both jobs will in theory provide you with similar training, technical experience, and the skills when you leave.
With the RN you will need to accept being at sea for periods, but you will probably travel around more, the RAF has less stations these days, so won’t routinely travel around so much, but then there are the ‘hot’ deployments.
Although the RN doesn’t have carriers or fixed wing fast-jets at the mo you could be joining at an interesting time as they are entering a new era of naval aviation with the two new carriers and F-35, they will need to build up and train for the new kit.

You really need to try and talk to people that are doing the same job as you want to do in the respective services at the moment.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

384

Send private message

By: danjama - 20th July 2011 at 18:06

Literally any advice or input is appreciated – i’m racking my brains here, just can’t decide what to do – very unlike me.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,682

Send private message

By: Dr Strangelove - 18th July 2011 at 20:57

I think the Hawks and King Airs are all maintained by civies, the good Dr will know more on those.

I know the Hawks are for sure, odd set up really, RAF Aircraft, on loan to Navy, operated by Babcocks for FRADU, my old chum Monkey Boy works for them.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,672

Send private message

By: pagen01 - 18th July 2011 at 20:48

Even more constructive, if you can travel this Wednesday is Culdrose air day be well worth a visit and a natter to the bods down there.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

384

Send private message

By: danjama - 18th July 2011 at 20:16

Edited – CoC Rule 15

Thank you, at last a constructive reply! 😎

After reading over in the Naval aviation sub-forum, It got me thinking. If I was to join the RN and train on rotory wing a/c, when/if the Navy does re-equip with fixed wing types, would I have an opportunity to convert to those units and re-train? Would I be given priority over new recruits? Or would it work the opposite – would they rather recruit a fresh flock for those types?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,672

Send private message

By: pagen01 - 18th July 2011 at 20:01

I think you will find the Navy would be a great place to do the same trade, have you visited Yeovilton or Culdrose? They both knock most RAF bases into a cocked hat!
Plenty of rotarys (ignore Moggys simplistic comment, a Merlin is more tech than a lot of fixed wing types), fixed wing is a bit scarce at the moment, I think the Hawks and King Airs are all maintained by civies, the good Dr will know more on those.
Personaly I would seriously consider the Navy.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

7,143

Send private message

By: Sky High - 18th July 2011 at 19:48

I always knew the Navy had rubbish techies – now we know why!!:diablo:

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

19,065

Send private message

By: Moggy C - 18th July 2011 at 19:31

Plenty of Helicopters, they are counted as aircraft. 😉

Not in civilised circles.

Moggy

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,682

Send private message

By: Dr Strangelove - 18th July 2011 at 19:23

but surely there are plans to equip or create squadrons with new fixed-wing jets? JSF?

Oh my….not the JSF 😮 not here, not in GD 😮

Go to that very dangerous topic area “Modern Military Aviation” for all you’ll never want to know about the dreaded F35/JSF 😀

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

384

Send private message

By: danjama - 18th July 2011 at 19:04

I know the FAA now consists of rotary wing aircraft (or Helo’s) since the Harrier’s retirement, but surely there are plans to equip or create squadrons with new fixed-wing jets? JSF?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,682

Send private message

By: Dr Strangelove - 18th July 2011 at 19:02

How about

The navy hasn’t any aircraft, nor will they have for years?

Moggy

Plenty of Helicopters, they are counted as aircraft. 😉

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

384

Send private message

By: danjama - 18th July 2011 at 18:58

That would explain the slack requirements :p

1 2
Sign in to post a reply