December 3, 2009 at 4:44 am
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=175678
Found this link on another forum.
German architect Jakob Tigges has projected a new and visionary landmark in Berlin. He plans to build a mountain of 1,000 meters high called “The Berg”, which would become a never-before-seen tourist destination in the German capital city. Seen at Plataforma Arquitectura. More images and description after the break.
The objective is to create a natural habitat for the mountain’s wildlife and at the same time, become a recreation space for everyone in the city. “The Berg” would take the place of the Tempelhof Airport, a space currently under discussion. Surprisingly, there’s a big group supporting “The Berg” and people are pressing to get the approval and financing of the project.

By: ADvonge09 - 10th December 2009 at 04:10
Making Mountains out of Molehills or in this case Templhoff
Thanks Paul.
I thought that this may be the case, but when I went to the MCA site it only really mentioned leisure users. Ill register our boat asap.
cheers,
t
By: bazv - 6th December 2009 at 09:39
I’m with Old Shape on this one…
The weight of the thing would be disastrous for the surrounds.
Rain Run off would be ‘interesting’
It would also alter the local weather.
The areas downsun of it would be a wee bit ‘gloomy’
Also a wee bit of an ‘obstruction’ to commercial flying in the area,if its there somebody will fly into it.
By: Ren Frew - 6th December 2009 at 02:10
It would be great if they named it the Schloß Adler and had a themed Junkers Ju-52 doing the pick up and drop off all day… ? 😀
By: cloud_9 - 5th December 2009 at 23:41
As crazy as it may sound, I actually like the idea.
I think its an innovative use of the space, and certainly makes a change from something normal like another skyscraper/tower or even housing. Secondly, it could be a turned into a great tourist attraction, especially if they built a visitor centre and hotel complex on the top (ok, thats my imagination running a tad wild there!…:))
By: Creaking Door - 5th December 2009 at 22:38
…in Munich between 1942 and 1945 all the rubble they left was dumped in one huge pile…
Berlin also has one of these called the Devil’s Mountain.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teufelsberg
At only 12 million cubic metres it is tiny compared to the 250+ million cubic metres needed to build a mountain 1000 metres high!
By: Moggy C - 5th December 2009 at 10:38
Moderators moving mountains eh…
It’s part of the job description.
Moggy 😀
By: Arabella-Cox - 5th December 2009 at 08:44
Making Mountains Out of Molehills
Our boys helped to build a mountain in Munich between 1942 and 1945 all the rubble they left was dumped in one huge pile and it was later grassed over and the Munich Olympic Stadium was built by its side.
Nosmo
By: old shape - 3rd December 2009 at 21:33
If it get’s the go ahead I think it will look superb.
Rain run-off is indeed a problem as mentioned above. The weight of it may have a significant bearing on the surrounding suburbs too. It will be like the rubber sheet/steel ball demonstration.
By: PMN - 3rd December 2009 at 16:10
If you can do a wee edit I’ll move it back.
Can you include spelling Tempelhof correctly in that edit? :diablo:
-runs and hides-
Paul
By: Sky High - 3rd December 2009 at 16:06
Ok KTYS, I admit I was a little hasty, but the title and content is not that obvious to the eye (even though you put Templhoff in it). If you can do a wee edit I’ll move it back.
Rgds
Dean.
It’s still not that relevant….is it? Wherever it is, it’s still bizarre.:confused:
By: Ren Frew - 3rd December 2009 at 15:51
Ok KTYS, I admit I was a little hasty, but the title and content is not that obvious to the eye (even though you put Templhoff in it). If you can do a wee edit I’ll move it back.
Rgds
Dean.
Moderator’s moving mountains eh… Whatever next ? 😉
By: Deano - 3rd December 2009 at 15:49
uh….it’s a former commercial airport might be changed into a mountain.
Ok KTYS, I admit I was a little hasty, but the title and content is not that obvious to the eye (even though you put Templhoff in it). If you can do a wee edit I’ll move it back.
Rgds
Dean.
By: Arabella-Cox - 3rd December 2009 at 15:06
And this has what to do with Commercial Aviation?
Moved
uh….it’s a former commercial airport might be changed into a mountain.
By: Deano - 3rd December 2009 at 12:02
They could charge a tenner to go hang gliding off it Deano… ? :diablo:
Then that’ll make it General Aviation :p
By: Ren Frew - 3rd December 2009 at 12:02
And this has what to do with Commercial Aviation?
Moved
They could charge a tenner to go hang gliding off it Deano… ? :diablo:
By: Creaking Door - 3rd December 2009 at 11:56
So, over 250 million cubic metres of rock, say 625 million tonnes of it…..where is it coming from and how much to shift it up there?
Even at €0.80 per tonne that’s half a billion Euros! Nope, I won’t be holding my breath! :rolleyes:
By: Sky High - 3rd December 2009 at 11:23
That is just bizarre. To construct an artificial mountain on the site of an airfield in a city. Edinburgh has its volcanic “plug”, Holyrood Park, but that is natural and pre-dates the city by millions of years. The city was built round it – not the other way round. And what are the civil engineering problems? 🙁
By: Deano - 3rd December 2009 at 11:08
And this has what to do with Commercial Aviation?
Moved
By: HP81 - 3rd December 2009 at 10:55
It looks great, but how would they manage the water run-off? Also how do construct it & ensure that it remains stable?
By: Bmused55 - 3rd December 2009 at 08:00
That’s just crazy!