What a fantastic story!
In Short, man marries woman. Marriage goes on for 15 years. Woman gets ill, man gives kidney to save her life.
Then man finds out that for past 7 years she’s been making the beast with two backs with her physio. Divorce starts and he wants the kidney back or 1.5Million USD as a payoff. Brilliant, and IMO 100% correct, the lying cheating cow.
By: steve rowell - 16th January 2009 at 07:44
I had some sauteed kidneys on toast this morning for breakfast…delicious
By: old shape - 15th January 2009 at 23:51
her husband has given her his. Kidney, the physio is giving her his sausage…
is it just me or does anyone else think she is making a casserole?
She must be a hot dish! Durex? No, Pyrex!
By: SPIT - 15th January 2009 at 22:57
Typical Yank , will sue for anything ????
By: AE90 - 15th January 2009 at 02:34
her husband has given her his. Kidney, the physio is giving her his sausage…
is it just me or does anyone else think she is making a casserole?
By: old shape - 10th January 2009 at 23:27
I thought an oxymoron was welder with a low IQ
Nah, that’d be a MigChav.
By: steve rowell - 10th January 2009 at 22:59
When yoo look up oxymoron “Legal ethics” is the first one you see. 🙁
I thought an oxymoron was a welder with a low IQ
By: Student Pilot - 10th January 2009 at 22:55
Yes, you’re spot on with the existing law. But, ethics now need to be looked at
When yoo look up oxymoron “Legal ethics” is the first one you see. 🙁
By: Kitty - 10th January 2009 at 20:01
Ehically he hasn’t a leg to stand on. Morally I’d take the carving knife to her myself.
By: old shape - 10th January 2009 at 18:36
He hasn’t got a hope in hell.
Donation is not a loan. Once something has been donated, ownership changes permanently and irrevocably.
Body parts can’t be deemed to be shared assets, either.
Looking at the other postings in this thread, presumably you’d all be of the same opinion if we were talking about a woman who had donated a kidney to a cheating husband?
Of course you would….. :rolleyes:
Yes, you’re spot on with the existing law. But, ethics now need to be looked at.
As for gender swapping, yes, I would.
Infidelity, once a committment is made, is a major No-no in my book.
By: MishaThePenguin - 10th January 2009 at 18:21
I’d love to see the medical ethicists take on this one!! I’m sure it would make the consent form interesting if he wins his case! (Though really he shouldn’t for the reasons already stated.)
By: Pondskater - 10th January 2009 at 13:20
I would imagine that you are not allowed to sell a kidney in the USA – ergo it has no cash value.
He loses but the judge will have fun with him.
By: Grey Area - 10th January 2009 at 12:25
He hasn’t got a hope in hell.
Donation is not a loan. Once something has been donated, ownership changes permanently and irrevocably.
Body parts can’t be deemed to be shared assets, either.
Looking at the other postings in this thread, presumably you’d all be of the same opinion if we were talking about a woman who had donated a kidney to a cheating husband?
Of course you would….. :rolleyes:
By: Flygirl - 10th January 2009 at 11:57
I think he deserves the pay off.
By: steve rowell - 10th January 2009 at 00:09
Too late…she ate it with some Fava beans
Sign In
January 9, 2009 at 11:50 pm