The US assistant secretary of state, Christopher Hill, said Chinese negotiators were “baffled” by North Korea’s refusal to respond to diplomatic overtures from its biggest aid donor and closest ally.
“Through this all, we have sought to speak with one voice and make a clear signal on what [the North Koreans] need to do,” Mr Hill told reporters in Beijing today. “So far they don’t seem to be interested in listening, much less doing anything to address the situation.
“I think the Chinese are as baffled as we are. China has done so much for that country and that country seems intent on taking all of China’s generosity and then giving nothing back.”
And the simpleton of the year award goes to……………………Christopher Hill……..of the united state’s state department.
No one really in Asia gives a damn whether NK tests missiles or nukes, least of all china. Where do you think NK gets the speciality materials for the missiles and centrifuges ( Ans: China ). When i say no one i ofcourse exclude irrational american lackeys like Japan, Australia etc.
By: escuincle - 15th July 2006 at 19:36
Looks like we have another incarnation of “ih8bush” :rolleyes:
“ih8bush” is sooooo last year, this year it is “McChimpyBushHitlerBurton” 😀
By: Anza_1 - 15th July 2006 at 02:47
i suppose if NK and America go to war milatary aviation will be involved.
It certainly will……we will get to watch South Korean F-16’s, F-4’s, F-5’s, and F-15’s make mincemeat out of the decrepit DPRKAF. 🙂
I donot think SK airforce would even get the chance to be airborne let alone make mincemeat out of NK airforce.
By: PhantomII - 14th July 2006 at 21:36
i suppose if NK and America go to war milatary aviation will be involved.
It certainly will……we will get to watch South Korean F-16’s, F-4’s, F-5’s, and F-15’s make mincemeat out of the decrepit DPRKAF. 🙂
By: bring_it_on - 14th July 2006 at 15:46
This thread belongs in GD and not here .
By: Anza - 14th July 2006 at 15:25
What does this got to do with Military Aviation?
i suppose if NK and America go to war milatary aviation will be involved. 🙂
By: Anza - 14th July 2006 at 15:23
Looks like we have another incarnation of “ih8bush” :rolleyes:
you need glasses in the whole quote i never once mentioned Bush or reffered to him. To like him or hate him is entirely a matter for the Americans themselves.
By: Showtime 100 - 14th July 2006 at 05:17
What does this got to do with Military Aviation?
By: Khazaria - 14th July 2006 at 03:20
ok thanks, thats just what i needed
By: Anza - 14th July 2006 at 03:16
oh, is it wrong to ask for a source to confirm this report?
i meant which bit you want source for???
article extract is from Guardian london report of the same title “North Korea shuns Chinese diplomacy”.
By: Khazaria - 14th July 2006 at 03:14
what you need source for?????
oh, is it wrong to ask for a source to confirm this report?
By: sferrin - 14th July 2006 at 03:11
The US assistant secretary of state, Christopher Hill, said Chinese negotiators were “baffled” by North Korea’s refusal to respond to diplomatic overtures from its biggest aid donor and closest ally.
“Through this all, we have sought to speak with one voice and make a clear signal on what [the North Koreans] need to do,” Mr Hill told reporters in Beijing today. “So far they don’t seem to be interested in listening, much less doing anything to address the situation.
“I think the Chinese are as baffled as we are. China has done so much for that country and that country seems intent on taking all of China’s generosity and then giving nothing back.”
And the simpleton of the year award goes to……………………Christopher Hill……..of the united state’s state department.
No one really in Asia gives a damn whether NK tests missiles or nukes, least of all china. Where do you think NK gets the speciality materials for the missiles and centrifuges ( Ans: China ). When i say no one i ofcourse exclude irrational american lackeys like Japan, Australia etc.
Looks like we have another incarnation of “ih8bush” :rolleyes:
By: Anza - 14th July 2006 at 03:07
sources please
what you need source for?????
By: Khazaria - 14th July 2006 at 03:00
sources please
By: Anza - 14th July 2006 at 01:51
Maybe that’s because they wouldn’t be targets? :rolleyes:
No thats not the only reason. We have our own stocks of missiles and nukes ( pak, india, china ) and we believe NK has every right to have the same as well.
By: J Boyle - 14th July 2006 at 01:29
No one really in Asia gives a damn whether NK tests missiles or nukes, least of all china. When i say no one i ofcourse exclude irrational american lackeys like Japan, Australia etc.
Maybe that’s because they wouldn’t be targets? :rolleyes:
Sign In
July 14, 2006 at 1:13 am