April 11, 2006 at 11:11 am
don’t know what you guys will make of this, but this guy is just to clever, even if i don’t agree with some of the political content, it is very remarkable art
By: dean f - 23rd April 2006 at 18:35
Bit of a tenuous link here but here we go,
Here in sunny Maidenhead we have an estate named THE BOMBER estate, Halifax road, Lancaster road etc(you get the drift!), people are now asking for the name to be changed because a bunch of kids calling themselves The Bomber Boys are spraying all over town.
This is an option that the town council are currently thinking about.
There is a debate on Maidenhead Advertiser Forum at the moment.
Dont let these vandals get away with it.
Dean
www.onebigworld.fotopic.net
By: Dave Homewood - 22nd April 2006 at 13:59
Though I generally abhor grafitti and the idiots who create it, I have to admit that there is the occassional piece that is classic. One that Billy Connolly pointed out as being so clever he used to visit it on every trip back to Wellington, NZ till it was recently demolished with the wall it was painted on, which read,
“You can always tell and Australian. But you can’t tell him much!”
By: steve rowell - 12th April 2006 at 01:17
The irresponsible scamps should be locked up, that is after they’ve been made to clean up their handiwork
By: Papa Lima - 11th April 2006 at 22:45
Do these “artists” actually buy the paint they use?
By: frankvw - 11th April 2006 at 22:35
My only regrets with those who spray graffitis is that the spraycans don’t explode in front of their faces, nicely coloring their faces for… say 2 weeks ?
By: Canpark - 11th April 2006 at 15:44
well i have always considered art as an objective product filtered by subjective mind, born in individual mind out of influence of collective surrounding. Its a way to stimulate objectivines out of subjective creation, thus needing this objective point of wiev to be evaluted and critised
Very well said, Golly:D
By: Grey Area - 11th April 2006 at 15:33
Spraying paint all over someone else’s property without their permission is criminal damage – “subjective creation” be damned! 😀
By: Gollevainen - 11th April 2006 at 15:27
well i have always considered art as an objective product filtered by subjective mind, born in individual mind out of influence of collective surrounding. Its a way to stimulate objectivines out of subjective creation, thus needing this objective point of wiev to be evaluted and critised
By: kev35 - 11th April 2006 at 15:19
Gollevainen.
By its very nature, art cannot be anything but subjective, thereby defeating the gist of your last comment.
regards,
kev35
By: Gollevainen - 11th April 2006 at 14:44
well then i would propaply show them some rebelion of my own style… :diablo:
but we cannot condemn art by our subjective feelings.
By: Grey Area - 11th April 2006 at 14:41
Thougth I have never painted any, i strongly support everybodys rigth to resist and rebel
Would you still hold that view if someone exercised their “right to resist and rebel” all over YOUR wall? 🙂
By: frankvw - 11th April 2006 at 14:37
A new sort of grafitti appreard in my street. A nitwit laid down on the street (on a freshly painted pedestrian crossing), traced the body contours, and then painted that outline with aerosols, as if a person got killed there.
Too bad no car passed there…
I have seen some acceptable grafitti,made on purposedly placed surfaces, along a factory’s 500 metre long brick wall, which was actually improving the place and avoided senseless “tagging” of gang names, but apart of that, this should be severely punished.
I suppose their authors need this to mark their territory, a bit the way dogs do it.
And for the record, I had to earse one made on my house on Saturday. The tag is gone, BUT instead I now have a huge pink square. SO, I’ll have to repaint the wall.
By: Gollevainen - 11th April 2006 at 14:22
when art beguns to follow lame laws and rule set by corrupted and banale middle class, it loses its all purpose as a true mouth horn of the surrounding enverioments psyke. graffitis are social phenemmenon rising from varios clashes of societyes horizontal levels, and by being truely honest and naive, whitout too much of dogmas or rules, its one of the most important artform in modern world.
Thougth I have never painted any, i strongly support everybodys rigth to resist and rebel :diablo: :diablo:
By: DazDaMan - 11th April 2006 at 12:55
Makes me wonder, why not put that talent to some good use? :rolleyes:
By: holty - 11th April 2006 at 12:49
fair comment on the graffiti and of course you are right, but some of his oil painting work and drawings are quite inspired…
By: kev35 - 11th April 2006 at 12:07
Vandalism by some inane ar*ehole who has a minor talent for art but a huge one for publicity. He should be charged for its removal and jailed for putting it there in the first place.
Holty, why does it not surprise me that you find his work ‘to(o) clever’? It’s absolute crap and I agree with Grey Area. It’s the support of the mindless minority that make graffiti artists feel they are something special when all they are is criminals.
Regards,
kev35
By: Guzzineil - 11th April 2006 at 11:49
It’s not art, it’s vandalism.
IMHO, of course.
I went to london yesterday for the first time for ages, and just about every surface seemed to have been scribbled-on by some aerosol toting moron.. no I’m not keen either.. 😀 :rolleyes:
Neil
By: Grey Area - 11th April 2006 at 11:36
It’s not art, it’s vandalism.
IMHO, of course.