Does anyone think Jet 2 and Fly Globespan would be a good fit? I think so because:
There is no route overlap
They both operate B737’s
They both have links in some way with Channel Express
I know there not the best reasons but they just seem well matched to me
By: EK. - 14th May 2005 at 18:01
EK is wrong, OSH is right. There are still some connections.
I stand corrected on the two aircraft then. Anyone think something could happen in the future between these two carriers?
By: RIPConcorde - 14th May 2005 at 01:37
Sorry, I thought GSM still leased some B737QC’s
EK is wrong, OSH is right. There are still some connections.
By: OSH - 13th May 2005 at 21:17
I believe Flyglobespan still wet lease 2 aircraft for EDI ops from Channex, G-CELR and TF-ELM.
By: Humberside - 13th May 2005 at 21:17
FlyGlobespan now has very little to do with Channel Express, as far as I know, just about no Globespan machines are leased from Channex.
Sorry, I thought GSM still leased some B737QC’s
Jet2 have a bit more than just a ‘link’ to Channel Express, Jet2 are Channel Express, Jet2 is just a trading name.
I used ‘link’ as a very broad term since I knew Dart Group PLC/Channel Express owned Jet 2 and I thought GSM did lease Channel Express Aircraft
Humberside
By: EK. - 13th May 2005 at 21:13
LBARULES is right GSM have nothing to do with Channel Express anymore but for some reason i also think GSM and LS would fit well together – cant see it happening but oh well.
By: LBARULES - 13th May 2005 at 21:11
Jet2 have a bit more than just a ‘link’ to Channel Express, Jet2 are Channel Express, Jet2 is just a trading name. FlyGlobespan now has very little to do with Channel Express, as far as I know, just about no Globespan machines are leased from Channex.
Maybe your right though, they do seem a good fit.
Sign In
May 13, 2005 at 9:09 pm