March 20, 2003 at 11:03 am
From the BBC:
******************************
Russian President Vladimir Putin has given the go-ahead for a plan for Russia’s armed forces to be made up mainly of volunteers within five years.
Mr Putin endorsed the main provisions of the plan in a meeting with heads of the Defence Ministry, paving the way for the recruitment of some 167,000 volunteers by the end of 2007.
The 1.1 million-strong Russian armed forces currently have about 130,000 contracted soldiers.
Mr Putin urged the military to finalise the plan so that it could be approved by the cabinet by June and included in next year’s budget
During the meeting, Defence Minister Sergey Ivanov reported on the progress of a pilot project – launched last September – in which a full division will be switched to contract soldiers.
He said that the experiment at the Pskov 76th airborne division would be completed by the end of the year.
But correspondents say pay increases at the division are a potential source of controversy.
Mr Ivanov said that a volunteer’s minimum monthly pay at the division would be raised from 1 March to 5,280 roubles ($168), roughly equal to that of a lieutenant elsewhere in the army.
The army has faced difficulties recruiting and retaining officers because of low pay.
For the moment, Russia’s military remains essentially a conscript force.
Conscription is unpopular and many young men are exempt for educational or family reasons.
Others simply fail to turn up for the draft because of widespread fears of poor treatment of young conscripts, miserable conditions and the war in Chechnya.
But Mr Putin’s plan to abandon the draft and launch a swift transfer to a smaller professional army has met stiff resistance from senior officers, who say it would require a significant increase in the defence budget.
***********************************
Can anyone provide anything a bit more substantial and detailed? I’d like to know how the contracts work, how long they last, what level of training is provided etc. Frankly and details would be much appreciated.
Also, this is a significant move for Russia which has never had a fully professional army and has acheived some excellent results wtih its conscripted forces (namely defeating Nazi Germany).
Your in put is most welcome.
By: ink - 24th March 2003 at 11:01
Actually all the KGB isn’t being re-formed in full. The foreign branch is will remain seperate from the new, larger FSB.
By: Arabella-Cox - 24th March 2003 at 00:50
Wierd… in one breath it is a backward step to communism and in the next breath it is an efficient thing to do that will save lives and improve coordination.
If we look at the worlds greatest democracy and look at echelon I’d suggest the claims that merely listening in to a few phone calls means the FSB will “own” all Russians is like suggesting the same for the US and its stooges (ie UK, Canada, NZ and Australia)… the fact that Echelon didn’t pick up the Iraqi invasion of Kuwaite, the attacks during 11/9 etc etc they don’t seem to offer anywhere near the power suggested in this article.
By: Vympel - 22nd March 2003 at 07:12
On www.themoscowtimes.com I heard that Putin is reassembling the FSB to be as large as the KGB was- because after the fall, the KGB was split into various agencies- i.e. the successor FSB lost control of the border guards for example.
Hardly surprising- I always thought splitting it was a bad idea. Too much bureaucracy.
“After the collapse of communism, the KGB was broken up into five separate agencies, but it was not fully disbanded nor was the successor organizations’ mode of operation seriously reformed. Now President Vladimir Putin, a former KGB operative, is reassembling the dreaded Soviet secret police.
The president announced that two former KGB agencies, the Federal Border Service and Federal Agency for Government Communications and Information, will be reintegrated with the main KGB successor agency, the FSB.
It was FAPSI’s job not only to encode and secure government communications, but also to intercept e-mails, faxes and other private communications, as well as to record telephone and radio conversations in Russia and abroad. Now the enlarged FSB will be able to listen to anything any Russian (including government officials) says or sends — without the need to involve other government agencies or explain its actions.
Everything will be concentrated in one big secret police agency: the authority to investigate suspected “foreign spies” and other wrongdoers the state does not like; and the ability to intrude deeply into the private lives of citizens using the most modern electronic means.
It is typical that while announcing the recreation of a KGB-style super secret police, Putin did not propose the creation of any, even superficial, public system for controlling its activities. Of course, an authoritarian state does not envisage any such controls.
The old-time all-powerful KGB not only controlled the lives and souls of its subjects, it also controlled the external borders of the Soviet Union. It seemed logical to bundle all the jobs into one super agency, including the border guards.
Now the FSB will also have its own massive armed force, the border guards — with more than 100,000 soldiers, armor, an air force and a navy. Why would a truly democratic country need such a hybrid super agency?
Putin’s official explanation for the secret service reforms is that “government structures are not acting efficiently enough or duly coordinating their efforts in this very important sphere.”
Putin’s assessment is correct — the lack of coordination is appalling. In fighting in Tajikistan in the 1990s and recently in the Caucasus, Russian border guards and the army both suffered unwarranted losses of men and equipment due to poor coordination.
The more recent encounters occurred last August and September in the Chechen mountains and in nearby Ingushetia when Chechen rebel groups allegedly infiltrated across the border from Georgia. In August, border guards were killed because they did not get sufficient heavy gun and air support from the army and air force in time. In September, the border guards in turn reportedly allowed a large rebel force to slip through their lines and did not inform the army in time or in full. A unit of the 58th army was ambushed in Ingushetia and suffered losses. It was later announced that the “bandits” were surrounded and would be eliminated. But in fact the rebels slipped away.
It would seem logical for Putin to correct this obvious lack of coordination by eliminating the inefficient Russian system of parallel armies that has border guards, Defense Ministry and Interior Ministry troops often fighting on the same battlefield under independent commands. Instead a new powerful FSB army is being created.
In many East European countries, former officers of once all-powerful communist secret police forces are banned from holding public office. In Russia, a former KGB officer is reforming the country to his likes and inserting KGB cronies in important positions.
A new drug tsar was appointed this week, Viktor Cherkesov, who will be head of a newly formed State Committee for the Control of Narcotics. Narcotics truly need controlling in Russia, but Cherkesov has a background of prosecuting Soviet-era dissidents and in more recent times charged the environmentalist Alexander Nikitin with “espionage.” Who can guarantee that in the future the new tsar will not use trumped-up narcotics charges to imprison dissidents?
The media has been subdued, but press freedom has not yet been fully eradicated. Putin has built a centralized system of authoritarian rule, but major unrestricted repression has been unleashed only in Chechnya. Today only Putin’s good will keeps Russia, which is balanced on the brink, from becoming a dictatorship. How long will this clemency last?”
This is Pavel Felgenhauer’s usual alarmist bullsh1t. I’ve heard his crap before- he pontificates at length about things he knows nothing about regularly.
By: Arabella-Cox - 22nd March 2003 at 01:57
The arms reductions from both CFE and this proposed reduction should lead to a cascade of much better equipment getting into the hands of the MVD. The KGB(now FSB) also had a border patrol role that has now become an anti smuggling role. They will also benefit from the freeing up of material.
By: Vympel - 21st March 2003 at 14:33
I believe the Interior Ministry (MVD) serves that function- well armed with tanks, APCs etc- even though their equipment is undoubtedly second-line (e.g. T-62s most common tank).
By: ink - 20th March 2003 at 18:28
Anyone know if they’re planning to back this professional force up with any kind of national reserve force like the British TA? If so, how would this work?
By: Vympel - 20th March 2003 at 13:14
Well, it’s a bit of a false cause fallacy to attribute the conscript system as having any effect on the USSR’s ass-kicking Nazi Germany. The Nazis had the draft as well, of course. In a war that huge, you can’t rely on volunteers. You’ve got to field as many men as possible.
Things are different now. The armed forces of Russia should be a core of highly trained volunteer pros with the best training and equipment they can get. This is what you need against Chechens and such. If there’s ever a titanic war again, conscription will of course be used again.