By: MANAIRPORTMAD - 3rd March 2005 at 22:55
More to the point, is it me or is the flymonarch worse than its orginal with just Monarch. Not sure myself yet.
I quite like it, fills abit more of the aircraft… :rolleyes: :p
By: MANAIRPORTMAD - 3rd March 2005 at 22:55
More to the point, is it me or is the flymonarch worse than its orginal with just Monarch. Not sure myself yet.
I quite like it, fills abit more of the aircraft… :rolleyes: :p
By: Duesseldwarf - 3rd March 2005 at 22:06
I prefer the Monarch titles with the flymonarch stuff at the back end of the fuselage.
By: Duesseldwarf - 3rd March 2005 at 22:06
I prefer the Monarch titles with the flymonarch stuff at the back end of the fuselage.
By: topjet330 - 3rd March 2005 at 22:04
Tell you what they have seen too much of Thomsonfly.com at Luton it “Inspired” them to be like the other charters.
Not be long before First Choice have a .co.uk on the side.
By: topjet330 - 3rd March 2005 at 22:04
Tell you what they have seen too much of Thomsonfly.com at Luton it “Inspired” them to be like the other charters.
Not be long before First Choice have a .co.uk on the side.
By: EK. - 3rd March 2005 at 22:03
More to the point, is it me or is the flymonarch worse than its orginal with just Monarch. Not sure myself yet.
Yes!! The new monarch livery is nice but get rid of the FLY and .COM
By: EK. - 3rd March 2005 at 22:03
More to the point, is it me or is the flymonarch worse than its orginal with just Monarch. Not sure myself yet.
Yes!! The new monarch livery is nice but get rid of the FLY and .COM
By: topjet330 - 3rd March 2005 at 21:58
More to the point, is it me or is the flymonarch worse than its orginal with just Monarch. Not sure myself yet.
By: topjet330 - 3rd March 2005 at 21:58
More to the point, is it me or is the flymonarch worse than its orginal with just Monarch. Not sure myself yet.
By: EK. - 3rd March 2005 at 21:10
Their is PLENTY more demand for more flights to SFB from GLA. I seen somewere they baught slots/rights for GLA to SFB and Cuba.
By: EK. - 3rd March 2005 at 21:10
Their is PLENTY more demand for more flights to SFB from GLA. I seen somewere they baught slots/rights for GLA to SFB and Cuba.
By: RIPConcorde - 3rd March 2005 at 21:06
Anyone know if there’s any truth in the rumour that Fly Globespan have leased G-BYDA for a year to run long haul services from Glasgow ?
It’s an interesting one. Seems awfully late in the day though for this summer, doesn’t it?! If the proposed route is true, then I don’t know why they want to try and add to the already plentiful GLA-SFB market. Either an alternative route from GLA or an EDI-SFB would be more appropriate, I feel.
All speculation of course, although Scotavnet is generally very reliable.
By: RIPConcorde - 3rd March 2005 at 21:06
Anyone know if there’s any truth in the rumour that Fly Globespan have leased G-BYDA for a year to run long haul services from Glasgow ?
It’s an interesting one. Seems awfully late in the day though for this summer, doesn’t it?! If the proposed route is true, then I don’t know why they want to try and add to the already plentiful GLA-SFB market. Either an alternative route from GLA or an EDI-SFB would be more appropriate, I feel.
All speculation of course, although Scotavnet is generally very reliable.
By: Ren Frew - 3rd March 2005 at 20:52
Anyone know if there’s any truth in the rumour that Fly Globespan have leased G-BYDA for a year to run long haul services from Glasgow ?
By: Ren Frew - 3rd March 2005 at 20:52
Anyone know if there’s any truth in the rumour that Fly Globespan have leased G-BYDA for a year to run long haul services from Glasgow ?
Sign In
March 3, 2005 at 8:38 pm
