Other than the clearly incompetent Pat Robertson (Robinson?), which of those groups have actually incited their followers to start attacking others? There is the KKK of course, and yes, those morons should clearly be eradicated.

I thought the whole point was about people spreading hatred. There are plenty here who do and that shows in their attitudes (racial and religious both). Are you telling me that this kind of hatred has never resulted in lynchings and violence? How about the Sikhs who were murdered because they were wearing turbans and were mistken as muslims by some really ignorant morons who had alot of the same kind of mudarssah teachings you are taking an issue with. You just need some event that would result in outpour of this sorts. How is that any different from what goes on in the heads of idiots being brainwashed in madrassah?

Again, how many people have started killing others as a result of their “teachings”?

Plenty if you count Bush as one of them. Infact way more than the AQ has killed so far.

Why are you only focusing on Pakistan when I clearly directed my attention to Saudi Arabia as well?

I am grateful for these small mercies but then u didn’t mention a long list of others. My question is why whenever something is discussed like this it turns into lordofthesea or someone sermoning ‘see i told you it all starts in Pakistan lets kills em all’.There are plenty of people that you can point your fingers towards for the mess your country has to deal in particular and west in general now . Alot of those fingers would be pointing towards washington.

Al Qaeda wasn’t supplied, funded, or trained by the CIA in Afghanistan.

It drew upon the same dangerous Jihadi idealogy that Washinton was completely supportive of and nurturing when the enemy was USSR. If these are not the same guys who have some how benefitted from training or materials by USA then where did these guys come from? What happened to your guys? I guess they just vanished from Afghanistan and a new breed of Jihadis came down and started this whole mess.

I never said invade anyone. And I’m not saying bomb everyone. Just the individuals promoting and directly inciting radical, extremist Islam and propagating new generations of terrorists. What exactly is wrong with simply attacking them directly at the source? Let me guess, it has to do with the fact that I mentioned “madrassa” and “Pakistan”, right?

Good you made it clear. But if you look at the whole thread this offtopic discussion started with someone repeating the same ‘invade’ line that i have seen in one or two more threads.
Regarding attacking the radicals thats already happening. And at times it targets and affects people who shouldn’t be. Even in Pakistan no matter what the govt says i m convinced US is having it’s way. Now please don’t say thats not enough, cause with all the free hand and freedom NATO and USA had in Afghanistan and Iraq they haven’t achieved much. Have they? How can you blame some stone age madrassah and some Idiotic bigoted mullahs for everything?
And no ‘madrassa’ part didn’t trigger this response from me. Infact i have argued with those guys as well and to say the least some of em are hopeless. But then firing a missile and killing underage kids won’t achieve anything. Dismantling or having stricter control over such instituitions will help way more than that. If you really have an issue with a mullah, get him disappeared by you know who in Pakistan, and fortunately for you no one would notice unlike here in USA. The same lawlessness in waziristan is working to your end as well. You can have as many ‘secret prisons’ and you can kill as many taxi drivers by sheer torture and nothing happens.