October 27, 2004 at 12:05 pm
The last Boeing 757 rolls off the production line tomorrow (Thursday)
See:- http://www.aero-news.net/news/commair.cfm?ContentBlockID=6f1792dc-f359-4d58-ab55-bd0471845afa&Dynamic=1
mmitch.
By: beistrich - 30th October 2004 at 21:53
Again, blinded by your “airbus is god” ideas you have missed the point.
aha…
Interresting how you think over me. But you are false
By: beistrich - 30th October 2004 at 21:53
Again, blinded by your “airbus is god” ideas you have missed the point.
aha…
Interresting how you think over me. But you are false
By: Bmused55 - 30th October 2004 at 18:21
Many people Option in this forum is Airbus, not Boeing
Yeah I know some people say the A321 is sooo underpowered.
But airlines replace 757 with A321 and use both on the same airportsask Bmused55 😉
Again, blinded by your “airbus is god” ideas you have missed the point.
The 757 can climb faster, steeper and in higher altitudes than any other aircraft in its class. It can do so with a higher load than any other airline in its class.
Regardless of what you think beistrich.. Airbus cannot touch the 757’s performance. In its class.
Other aircraft are starting to replace the 757 because many airlines do not use the 757 for the types of conditions it was designed for. The market has changed since the 757 was launched. There are far less airports with short runways or heavy noise restrictions.
Still, the fact that ther 757 still remains a strong player is testament to its versatility.
I don’t see any A321’s doing regular transatlantic flights, do you?
By: Bmused55 - 30th October 2004 at 18:21
Many people Option in this forum is Airbus, not Boeing
Yeah I know some people say the A321 is sooo underpowered.
But airlines replace 757 with A321 and use both on the same airportsask Bmused55 😉
Again, blinded by your “airbus is god” ideas you have missed the point.
The 757 can climb faster, steeper and in higher altitudes than any other aircraft in its class. It can do so with a higher load than any other airline in its class.
Regardless of what you think beistrich.. Airbus cannot touch the 757’s performance. In its class.
Other aircraft are starting to replace the 757 because many airlines do not use the 757 for the types of conditions it was designed for. The market has changed since the 757 was launched. There are far less airports with short runways or heavy noise restrictions.
Still, the fact that ther 757 still remains a strong player is testament to its versatility.
I don’t see any A321’s doing regular transatlantic flights, do you?
By: beistrich - 30th October 2004 at 18:17
nfact, many peoples opinion and a bucket load of fact.
Many people Option in this forum is Airbus, not Boeing
If we look at simple performance terms… no Airbus product comes close to the 757 in its class. Fact. That is whats talked about, nothing more
Yeah I know some people say the A321 is sooo underpowered.
But airlines replace 757 with A321 and use both on the same airports
Why does just about every thread have to turn into this drivel?
Boooooooorrrrrrriiiiiiiingggggggggg
ask Bmused55 😉
By: beistrich - 30th October 2004 at 18:17
nfact, many peoples opinion and a bucket load of fact.
Many people Option in this forum is Airbus, not Boeing
If we look at simple performance terms… no Airbus product comes close to the 757 in its class. Fact. That is whats talked about, nothing more
Yeah I know some people say the A321 is sooo underpowered.
But airlines replace 757 with A321 and use both on the same airports
Why does just about every thread have to turn into this drivel?
Boooooooorrrrrrriiiiiiiingggggggggg
ask Bmused55 😉
By: LBARULES - 30th October 2004 at 17:54
Im not asking anyone or pointing the finger at anyone, just dont turn every thread into this as it is very boring!
By: LBARULES - 30th October 2004 at 17:54
Im not asking anyone or pointing the finger at anyone, just dont turn every thread into this as it is very boring!
By: Bmused55 - 30th October 2004 at 17:50
Why does just about every thread have to turn into this drivel?
Boooooooorrrrrrriiiiiiiingggggggggg
Ask grey area
By: Bmused55 - 30th October 2004 at 17:50
Why does just about every thread have to turn into this drivel?
Boooooooorrrrrrriiiiiiiingggggggggg
Ask grey area
By: LBARULES - 30th October 2004 at 17:49
Why does just about every thread have to turn into this drivel?
Boooooooorrrrrrriiiiiiiingggggggggg
By: LBARULES - 30th October 2004 at 17:49
Why does just about every thread have to turn into this drivel?
Boooooooorrrrrrriiiiiiiingggggggggg
By: Bmused55 - 30th October 2004 at 17:26
You, my boy, are a fine one to criticise anyone else for jumping down people’s throats or, indeed, for showing contempt for opinions that differ from one’s own.
Onto to the “Ignore” list with you, along with your soulmate GLA_Rules in his various incarnations.
whatever floats your boat.
I tire of your over critical replies anyway. Perhaps this way you’ll leave me alone.
By: Bmused55 - 30th October 2004 at 17:26
You, my boy, are a fine one to criticise anyone else for jumping down people’s throats or, indeed, for showing contempt for opinions that differ from one’s own.
Onto to the “Ignore” list with you, along with your soulmate GLA_Rules in his various incarnations.
whatever floats your boat.
I tire of your over critical replies anyway. Perhaps this way you’ll leave me alone.
By: Grey Area - 30th October 2004 at 17:04
You, my boy, are a fine one to criticise anyone else for jumping down people’s throats or, indeed, for showing contempt for opinions that differ from one’s own.
Onto to the “Ignore” list with you, along with your soulmate GLA_Rules in his various incarnations.
By: Grey Area - 30th October 2004 at 17:04
You, my boy, are a fine one to criticise anyone else for jumping down people’s throats or, indeed, for showing contempt for opinions that differ from one’s own.
Onto to the “Ignore” list with you, along with your soulmate GLA_Rules in his various incarnations.
By: Bmused55 - 30th October 2004 at 17:00
Hmmm….I would venture to suggest that your evangelical zeal to preach the superiority of all things Boeing overcame your critical faculties.
Maybe you should make yourself clearer in future, then this sort of thing wouldn’t happen, eh?
And maybe you should practice a little more control over your tendancies to jump down someones throat.
I simply neglected to add “in its class” to the sentence. Nothing more.
By: Bmused55 - 30th October 2004 at 17:00
Hmmm….I would venture to suggest that your evangelical zeal to preach the superiority of all things Boeing overcame your critical faculties.
Maybe you should make yourself clearer in future, then this sort of thing wouldn’t happen, eh?
And maybe you should practice a little more control over your tendancies to jump down someones throat.
I simply neglected to add “in its class” to the sentence. Nothing more.
By: Grey Area - 30th October 2004 at 16:57
It was fine till you took the literal meaning for a mis written line.
Hmmm….I would venture to suggest that your evangelical zeal to preach the superiority of all things Boeing overcame your critical faculties.
Maybe you should make yourself clearer in future, then this sort of thing wouldn’t happen, eh?
By: Grey Area - 30th October 2004 at 16:57
It was fine till you took the literal meaning for a mis written line.
Hmmm….I would venture to suggest that your evangelical zeal to preach the superiority of all things Boeing overcame your critical faculties.
Maybe you should make yourself clearer in future, then this sort of thing wouldn’t happen, eh?