September 8, 2004 at 3:10 pm
By: Dantheman77 - 10th June 2005 at 18:41
Dont suppose you could knock up a BA Oneworld c/s could you bmused?
By: bmi-star - 10th June 2005 at 17:49
UA Star looking much better than the SQ one there for some reason
By: Hand87_5 - 10th June 2005 at 17:06
I definitely looooove the 772 🙂
By: seahawk - 10th June 2005 at 16:49
Hmm somehow the Star Alliance livery does not look good on the 777, it looks better on the A346 however
By: mmemovements - 10th June 2005 at 07:54
That livery looks a hell of a lot better than SQ’s can’t be bothered livery
Scott
By: ASIA - 10th June 2005 at 07:07


By: Pablo - 9th September 2004 at 16:10
I think it looks a bit odd to be honest. The Star Alliance titles are huge in comparison to the Singapore Airlines ones and the white fuselage looks unfinished.
By: DarrenBe - 9th September 2004 at 14:29
Any sign of the A321’s getting the house livery treatment yet ?
Not that I know of.
By: T5 - 9th September 2004 at 14:28
I don’t like it either.
The Star Alliance colour scheme seems to vary from airline to airline. The fact that the title only fills about two thirds of the fuselage in this example doesn’t make it so appealing.
I am quite keen on the Thai and bmi examples, where the “Star Alliance” title fills the entire fuselage, with the airline squeezed in below.
By: ASIA - 9th September 2004 at 13:13
Come join Star Alliance and save on Paint!! 🙂
That’s the most funny comment I’ve ever heard about S.A. paint scheme… 😀
By: Ren Frew - 9th September 2004 at 13:06
One of our ER4’s may be getting the same treatment next month, but it is already in the original Star Alliance livery, complete with ‘washing line’. I gather that the ‘washing line’ will disappear and be replaced with ‘Star Alliance’ lettering across the fuselage along with the airline’s name.
Any sign of the A321’s getting the house livery treatment yet ?
By: DarrenBe - 9th September 2004 at 11:34
I understand this is a ‘new’ scheme for the Star Alliance, basically to add the ‘Star Alliance’ lettering to the side of the fuselage and leaving as much of the carrier’s own livery untouched.
One of our ER4’s may be getting the same treatment next month, but it is already in the original Star Alliance livery, complete with ‘washing line’. I gather that the ‘washing line’ will disappear and be replaced with ‘Star Alliance’ lettering across the fuselage along with the airline’s name.
By: Grey Area - 9th September 2004 at 07:46
Was this for a distinct reason?
Seems that way, ACA345. I posted a shot of B747 9V-SPP in an identical scheme a couple of days ago.
By: steve rowell - 9th September 2004 at 07:00
Unimaginative
By: ACA345 - 9th September 2004 at 03:24
I do not mind the Star c/s at all really. It does lack in visual qualities, but it is simply a modern corporate brand. My question is why SQ have departed from all the other Star aircraft of other ailines. On the SQ aircraft it lacks the tail, and the immense lettering. Was this for a distinct reason?
By: Nasir - 9th September 2004 at 02:21
Come join Star Alliance and save on Paint!! 🙂
By: LBARULES - 8th September 2004 at 15:36
Indeed a very boring scheme, but a great shot 🙂
By: Bmused55 - 8th September 2004 at 15:33
boooooooooriiiiiiiing *yawns* bland and uninspired