June 30, 2004 at 7:45 pm
As things are a bit quiet on here today, I thought I’d surprise you all and give you a treat……
By: Speedbird 12T - 30th June 2004 at 22:11
Well, the exhaust temperature of an RB211 is somewhere in the order of 450 C, so it’d have to be a very hot day indeed!
Well there goes my theory
By: Grey Area - 30th June 2004 at 22:09
Well, the exhaust temperature of an RB211 is somewhere in the order of 450 C, so it’d have to be a very hot day indeed!
By: Speedbird 12T - 30th June 2004 at 21:50
Would there not only be visable exhaust when its cold as it is hot air, and so if its warmer air the less visable the exhaust gases?-Just a theory
By: Grey Area - 30th June 2004 at 21:45
Fair enough, then. I just called what I thought I saw.
By: tenthije - 30th June 2004 at 21:37
The sun is coming from directly in front of the plane it would appear. THat’s why the planes in the back are completely lit whereas the 747 is only lit full at the nose and lit barely at the tail.
As for the jet exhaust, I can’t really explain that. Having said that, I have made more than a few photos of 747s taking of where little or no exhaust was visible. Sam Chui is really good as RIPConcorde already mentioned. SC is not someone who I’d consider likely to cheat in any way shape or form.
By: RIPConcorde - 30th June 2004 at 21:33
Two things (apart from the angle of the sun) about that BA picture still nag at me .
1) If you look closely at the area around the tail and tailcone it looks as though it’s been matted onto the background.
2) Where’s the exhaust from the 4 engines? The background behind the rear of the aircraft should be blurred by the hot exhaust gases (compare with the IL62 picture). It doesn’t appear to be, though.
I wouldn’t doubt pics taken by that Sam Chui. He’s a professional! 🙂
Plus airliners.net would probably reject it if they had any doubts over it.
By: Grey Area - 30th June 2004 at 21:24
Two things (apart from the angle of the sun) about that BA picture still nag at me .
1) If you look closely at the area around the tail and tailcone it looks as though it’s been matted onto the background.
2) Where’s the exhaust from the 4 engines? The background behind the rear of the aircraft should be blurred by the hot exhaust gases (compare with the IL62 picture). It doesn’t appear to be, though.
By: Speedbird 12T - 30th June 2004 at 21:09
Now thats a desktop picture! (the BA picture)
By: concordesst - 30th June 2004 at 21:07
That last one is a keeper!!!
By: Mark L - 30th June 2004 at 20:53
I found this gem of a picture today, not very good quality, but the actual subject…!!!
By: tenthije - 30th June 2004 at 20:40
The lightning on that 747 is correct. The photographer seems to be standing at a taxiway linking the runway. Therefore it looks like that. Excellent photo made by someone with excellent connections at the airport!
By: Arabella-Cox - 30th June 2004 at 20:01
I didn’t realise that, thanks you’re right it does look like its on a taxiway a bit odd like?
By: Grey Area - 30th June 2004 at 19:54
Oooooo!!! I”m not sure about that 747……….
Check out the angle of the sunlight on the aircraft in the background – surely the fuselage of the 747 on the side facing the photographer should be similarly lit? Also it appears to be about to land on a taxiway. 😮
The Ilyushin is an absolute peach, though. 😀
By: Arabella-Cox - 30th June 2004 at 19:51
And this……