dark light

Concorde Letter in this months issue

Did anyone else read the letter about the retirement of Concorde in this months issue of AW?

It suggested that BA had been forced to retire Concorde because Air France had already made the decision to retire it’s fleet and airbus refused to offer support for Concorde to BA after October.

What do you guys think of this. I haven’t had a chance to speak to any of my friends over at BA yet, but I’ll see what I can find out. If it is true I think it’s utterly disgraceful.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,331

Send private message

By: wysiwyg - 11th July 2003 at 21:15

I put that point to the management pilots and they said if they don’t sort out the short term there won’t be any need for a strategic view! Branson isn’t short of ‘wonderful’ ideas but invariably it’s not him that has to pick up the pieces to make them work.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,815

Send private message

By: mongu - 11th July 2003 at 20:30

I think RB has more of a strategic view, rather than merely looking at how Conc will affect short term profits.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,331

Send private message

By: wysiwyg - 11th July 2003 at 12:36

Having spoken to a Virgin manager recently and a couple of their management pilots there is a lot of concern going round just in case Branson actually succeeds in getting a Concorde. Their business is still struggling enough with coping with the after effects of the last 2 years without operating a high cost PR aircraft. RB’s views are definitely not shared by the people who actually run the airline. If BA genuinely want to get rid of Virgin the easiest way for them to do it is to give them all their Concordes for nothing right now!

regards
wys

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,009

Send private message

By: OneLeft - 11th July 2003 at 11:42

The letter isn’t absolutely accurate, but it is nearer the truth than any other I have seen.

It isn’t a case of Airbus needing two airlines flying Corcorde for it to be worthwhile, they have been pressuring BA and AF to ground the aircraft for a long time now, as truth be told it has been a commercial liability to all three companies for some time now.

With AF deciding to ground their fleet BA were backed into a corner as Airbus piled on the pressure to do the same. I also suspect that it was good timing for BA.

I understand the emotion of this aircraft ( I had in fact just applied to work on the fleet when its retirement was announced (I am BA cabin Crew)), however bottom line is that airlines, even the big ones, are businesses that are about making money, and this aircraft is a commercial nightmare in todays aviation industry.

Regarding Richard Branson and Concorde, he is doing what he does best, milking a publicity opportunity! If he thought for one moment he had any chance of getting his hands on Concorde he wouldn’t have said a word about it. As it is he can bleat on about it without any risk of Virgin ever having to operate the aircraft.

Concorde would be a disaster for Virgin, and as a great fan of the airline, I think that would be a bigger shame than Concorde being retired.

1L.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

14,422

Send private message

By: steve rowell - 11th July 2003 at 04:08

I agree with Ren, what about Sir Richard

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

11,401

Send private message

By: Ren Frew - 10th July 2003 at 20:38

I read it and I think it insinuates Airbus need at least two airlines running the plane to make it worth their while… So why not Mr Branson then ?

Sign in to post a reply