The comments against Alaska seem like a cheap shot to me, and have no bearing on the case.

OK enough is enough. Firstly, Alaska IS an integral part of this thread and therefore does invite comments of any sensible type if members wish to add them. I was not aware that there an active censor in place, other than moderators, to ensure that comments viewed by others as having “no bearing” on the case are not permitted, perhaps in future you may like to prefix comments such as the above quote with the courtesy of IMO or longhand “in my opinion”

What you regard as a “cheap shot” at Alaska was in fact originated by the National Geographic channel programme as detailed earlier. All the more ironic that I supplied additional information about it at your request! My comments that I would not fly on Alaska based on that information is MY choice to make. There may be cheap shots around here, but I’m not the one firing them.