November 26, 2013 at 2:04 pm
It seems that I-17 also has such oil cooler under wings?
Are there others?
By: scrooge - 27th November 2013 at 00:29
I understand that the radiator in the Hind series aircraft had bungee assisted retraction systems and were normally flown in the fully retracted position (or had a locking mechanisim?). If however the radiator was extended or not locked and the aircraft flown inverted (aerobatics, combat) then between the bungees and gravity there would be a very loud noise as the radiator arrived at it’s stops.
These radiators were a honeycomb of copper tubes held in place by lead solder and quite heavy.
By: ChernKStewfan - 26th November 2013 at 20:50
The MS 406 had a radiator that could be lowered/raised (or extended/retracted if one prefers) depending on drag/cooling requirements. It seemed to be more trouble than it was worth, because on the MS 410 (upgraded 406) and other developments the radiator assembly was fixed.
By: Graham Boak - 26th November 2013 at 15:43
We’d say extendable or retractable, perhaps. Other examples are on the Hawker Hart family of biplanes, and apparently on the prototype Ar240s. It was a means for reducing the drag when full cooling was not required. I believe it can be seen on other types, where not specifically known, by the apparent ability of the radiator to slide within an outer shell – perhaps I am thinking of the later He111 installation here? Later designs would use a series of flaps or gills to control the airflow through a fixed radiator.
By: antoni - 26th November 2013 at 15:23
Stretchable misspelled I think. It could be lowered and raised. IIRC some aircraft had stretchable radiators.
By: Moggy C - 26th November 2013 at 15:04
I’m afraid ‘strenchable’ is not a word I have ever come across before. I fear it might be a translation error.
What does this oil cooler actually do that’s different? (Already guessed it cools oil)
Moggy