September 13, 2013 at 3:45 pm
Which Spitfire? And who?
By: Arabella-Cox - 15th September 2013 at 12:47
Thanks, G-ORDY, for the positive identification.
By: Propstrike - 14th September 2013 at 09:14
43-2195
I think it might take more than that!!
It was inevitable that egos were going to get caught in the crossfire in all that Burma Bolleaux 🙁
Still a shame though.
By: Arabella-Cox - 14th September 2013 at 08:32
43-2195
I think it might take more than that!!
By: 43-2195 - 14th September 2013 at 00:39
Andy, all these Spitfire identity questions of late, are you trying to lure Mark 12 out of his self imposed Forum exile?
By: DazDaMan - 13th September 2013 at 19:31
Just had another quick look – the entry for RW393 says she was used by Elliot.
By: DazDaMan - 13th September 2013 at 19:28
Looks more white than light blue (although obviously that could be the effect of the film).
I was briefly thumbing through Spitfire – The History earlier, and there’s a shot of RW393 with some similar-looking markings on the fuselage. However, I can’t scan or take a pic, otherwise I would post it.
By: Arabella-Cox - 13th September 2013 at 18:29
Yes, I think you are correct.
Was SL721 used by him, too?
By: Alan Clark - 13th September 2013 at 18:17
The Air Marshal (judging by the command flag on the side of the aircraft) in the photo looks more like James Milne-Robb’s successor (Fighter Command crest also painted on the a/c), Air Marshal William Elliott
By: Arabella-Cox - 13th September 2013 at 17:45
Yes, those were my initial thoughts. But then I cannot see the JMR codes (and this doesn’t look too much like James Milne-Robb, either) and the various emblems are not as I had seen them before. Plus…the finish seems much lighter, somehow?
I came across this photo, by the way, whilst searching for photographs of damage to the Thorney hangars following the attack on 18 August 1940 – still obvious in this image!
By: D1566 - 13th September 2013 at 16:49
Is it SL721?