June 26, 2013 at 6:01 pm
Don’t know if this has been posted before, but which Stirling wreck is this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MfoVx7diMIY
By: hindenburg - 13th July 2013 at 13:31
This is really interesting,thanks for posting Scott..I think it certainlt warrants further investigation..my scuba buddies are chasing it up.
By: 1batfastard - 5th July 2013 at 17:42
Hi All,
Better to have to many than run short surely ? :confused:
Geoff.
By: 12jaguar - 5th July 2013 at 07:33
Possibly, although to be honest we’ve got a fair selection of u/c components, probably enough to build a complete assembly at some stage
John
By: 1batfastard - 4th July 2013 at 19:32
Wouldn’t the Stirling project benefit from any of that im thinking undercarriage wise in particular :confused:
Geoff.
By: hindenburg - 4th July 2013 at 19:28
I`ll get my flippers…a very interesting section there…..
By: JagRigger - 27th June 2013 at 14:35
Looks like one of the props was feathered too………
By: Arabella-Cox - 27th June 2013 at 12:45
Fascinating bit of old war wreckage, it looks as if the aircraft ditched successfully then sank, hopefully after the crew escaped.
It will probably have hit the bottom nose first and demolished the whole front end before gently settling on its back, which probably accounts for the apparent lack of a cockpit. Depending on the amount of silt on the bottom the front end should still be there albeit somewhat compacted and buried out of sight, I would have thought.
Of course, it is always possible that the aircraft broke up on impact and the nose and tail lie elsewhere. The nose will have gone straight down whilst the wings/centre section may have drifted away from the impact point.
Not much there worth salvaging, in my book. However, the exhaust collector rings might be OK – or at least some of them.
Anon.
By: CeBro - 27th June 2013 at 11:23
No trace of the cockpit so it seems?
Cees
By: Bombgone - 27th June 2013 at 11:12
Very impressive quality Video. Looking at the exposure of the engine sleeve valves suggests salt water environment. Looks like its been hit by trawler nets a few times. Be great to trace the history of the aircraft.
By: DocStirling - 26th June 2013 at 20:48
Hmmm, no takers yet?!
Yes, it is upside down, not much fuselage visible but plenty of wings, engines and that great u/c assembly!!. I am guessing off the coast of Denmark – obviously not in a fjord or lake – and it is very deep- about 40m I think the dive computer said, and the guys appear to be using heliox rigs to dive. A different kettle of fish to the Dornier salvage methinks, but there is an opportunity……;)
By: Mr Merry - 26th June 2013 at 19:44
Engines seem recoverable but not much else. I stand to be corrected though. Is it upside-down as per the Dornier?
By: 12jaguar - 26th June 2013 at 19:37
hmmm very interesting
By: Jayce - 26th June 2013 at 19:34
Heh, the blue lobster is almost as rare as the Stirling!
By: Whitley_Project - 26th June 2013 at 18:46
Never seen that one before either – thanks for posting Scott. Even if someone could get one of the nacelle assemblies up that would be great. Come on Stirling boys…..!
By: sCOTT bROOKES - 26th June 2013 at 18:19
No problem Daniel. I’m amazed at what remains of the aircraft. Sorry for the poor spelling. Should read Stirling;)
By: DocStirling - 26th June 2013 at 18:14
Very interesting, thanks for posting. I have not seen it before, and cannot identify it myself, but I am sure there are people here who will be able to.
daniel