April 11, 2013 at 4:10 pm
Another picture from the SDASM collection. They call it “Putilov STAL-3bis”. This time I am pretty sure they are right. But not absolutely.
airwar.ru has a webpage for the “OOS STAL-3”:
http://airwar.ru/enc/cw1/stal3.html
but all these aircraft there have a radial engine. The one in my picture seems to be equipped with a Klimov M-100 inline engine. The other outline of the aircraft matches, although it seems to have no fuselage windows (maybe a freightplane).
You also cannot successfully google for it. When you try on google.ru, you find modellers constructing such an aircraft, but with no explaining text.
Can you say something about this aircraft? Thank you if you do! If not, I hope this thread is interesting for you.
Regards, RT
By: Romantic Techno - 13th April 2013 at 09:44
Thank you Flyer!:rolleyes:
OK, I drop the “bis” and store this aircraft as “Putilov STAL-3 with M-17 engine”. Your other details will be kept in the picture’s comment section.
Best regards, RT
By: Flyer - 12th April 2013 at 18:15
Dear RT !
To answer Your questions:
1) Yes, in early Russian designations the “bis” means “modified” (like Italian aircraft designations of that era). But Russian Aviation historians do not confirm the existence of “Stal -3bis” designation for M-17-engined “Stal-3” aircrafts. This is possibly, such “designation” was used in some unofficial papers or in conversations to distinguish one type from another.
2) Russian abbreviation “OOS” means “Department of Experimental Aircraft Construction”, which was established in beginning of year 1930. The Chief Designer of this department was A. I. Putilov; there also other designers worked in OOS.
So, we can write full aircraft name: OOS “Stal-3”, or Putilov “Stal-3” – both ways are right.
By: antoni - 11th April 2013 at 21:03
bis means modified.
By: Romantic Techno - 11th April 2013 at 19:49
Hi friends,
thank you for your answers!:)
But I still need some details:
1) Can you verify the suffix “bis” for this aircraft?
2) “Putilov” is the same like the armament factory, later named “Kirov”? In this context, the brand name “OOS” has nothing to do with either?
Thank you for interest + further answers!;)
Regards, RT
By: Flyer - 11th April 2013 at 18:03
Hello from Russia, dear RT !
Mr Al Elliott was faster with his answer !
Yes, this is very rare photo.
Here is “Stal-3” airplane, equipped with water-cooled M-17 engine.
Fuselage windows exists, of course – You can not see them because of angle of shot.
Some examples of usual “Stal-3” airplanes with radial engines were later re-equipped with M-17 engines. But this replacement has not brought any advantages in comparison with radial motors.
By: Al Elliott - 11th April 2013 at 17:53
According to “The Osprey Encyclopedia of Russian Aircraft 1875 – 1995” (by Bill Gunston), p278, ‘several’ Stal-3 were equipped with the M-17 engine, a license product of the BMW VI water cooled V-12-engine.
Al