dark light

BoB movie low-back Spits- Question.

As is well known, various low back Spitfires ( XVI’s ) were modified with ‘false’ backs to form the ‘Mark Addie’.

This was achieved with timber decking and fabric, and of course looked quite convincing. My question is was the modification fit for flight, or static use only?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,097

Send private message

By: Seafuryfan - 19th December 2012 at 07:01

And you won’t get it, unless you want to pay a hefty sum or chance find it a car boot…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

561

Send private message

By: mackerel - 18th December 2012 at 22:14

Thanks daz, I havent got that book.

Steve”P”

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 18th December 2012 at 22:08

Robert Rudhall’s book lists:

RW382
SL574
TE311
TE356
TE384
TE476

(Would TE308 count since, technically, it was a low-back before conversion to Type 509?? :diablo: )

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

561

Send private message

By: mackerel - 18th December 2012 at 21:47

Does anybody know which low back airframes were used.

Steve”P”

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

9,127

Send private message

By: Mark12 - 18th December 2012 at 19:56

Not fit for flight but actually made of aluminiun.

Mark

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v634/Mark12/16-TE3114Duxford18April1968ImagePeterRArnold01a.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 18th December 2012 at 18:47

Indeed.

I believe that, if you look closely at the aircraft in the film, the non-flyers can be identified by a lack of rudder trim tabs (although I could be wrong on that).

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

3,488

Send private message

By: Propstrike - 18th December 2012 at 18:24

Thanks for the feedback.

So we concur, do we, no flyers ?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

20,613

Send private message

By: DazDaMan - 18th December 2012 at 18:01

TE311 being one such aircraft – a good photo of it in the make-up department was in Robert Rudhall’s Battle of Britain film book.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,176

Send private message

By: Robert Whitton - 18th December 2012 at 14:57

My question is was the modification fit for flight, or static use only?

Static and taxiing. Never seen any photos of them under alteration so don’t know how the additions were actually attached.

Sign in to post a reply