September 26, 2012 at 2:35 pm
I am looking for some seamless “CDS” steel tube, that can be re-profiled to the correct A & P sections for the U/C legs, & the trailing edge tubes for my Snipe, & would like to know if any one has anything suitable that is spare to their own needs ?.
The sizes I am looking for are 7/16″ 22g CDS “mild steel or T64 spec”. & 2.5″ 17g T45(actual tube size needed is 2.486″, but have been told that 2.5″ will do).
I have already tried quite a few tube suppliers, with little or no luck so far.
Any leads would be gratefuly received.
Bob T.
By: sopwith.7f1 - 30th September 2012 at 11:28
Hi Bruce
There would not be any problems using 16g instead of 17g, it’s only a matter of historical accuracy.
If I can’t obtain the correct gauge, then I will use 16g, but it will still be re-profiled to the correct aerofoil section.
Bob T.
By: sopwith.7f1 - 30th September 2012 at 11:28
Hi Bruce
There would not be any problems using 16g instead of 17g, it’s only a matter of historical accuracy.
If I can’t obtain the correct gauge, then I will use 16g, but it will still be re-profiled to the correct aerofoil section.
Bob T.
By: Bruce - 30th September 2012 at 10:16
Can you not either:
Alter the end fittings to fit, or
Machine out the end of the tubes, with a reducing taper, to accomodate originals?
Bruce
By: Bruce - 30th September 2012 at 10:16
Can you not either:
Alter the end fittings to fit, or
Machine out the end of the tubes, with a reducing taper, to accomodate originals?
Bruce
By: sopwith.7f1 - 30th September 2012 at 09:48
Hello Bob, where can you get the 2.5″ by 16swg from, we needed some for the Comet u/c legs and couldnt get any so settled for 4130 which was only available in .120″ wall which we had to have specialy machined down to the correct thickness.
I dont think you will find it in 17swg as they havent made tubes in the odd number sizes for a very long time. Would it matter slightly thicker as the 16swg is only .006″ thicker.
Ken
Hi Ken
The 2.5″ 16g tube would be supplied by Retrotech, if I can’t obtain any in 17g . I could have it re-drawn down to the correct gauge, but as I only need about 15′, it would be prohibitively expensive.
17g is still made, but only in a few sizes.
Any chance of you putting some photo’s of your Comet project on this forum ?.
Bob T.
By: sopwith.7f1 - 30th September 2012 at 09:48
Hello Bob, where can you get the 2.5″ by 16swg from, we needed some for the Comet u/c legs and couldnt get any so settled for 4130 which was only available in .120″ wall which we had to have specialy machined down to the correct thickness.
I dont think you will find it in 17swg as they havent made tubes in the odd number sizes for a very long time. Would it matter slightly thicker as the 16swg is only .006″ thicker.
Ken
Hi Ken
The 2.5″ 16g tube would be supplied by Retrotech, if I can’t obtain any in 17g . I could have it re-drawn down to the correct gauge, but as I only need about 15′, it would be prohibitively expensive.
17g is still made, but only in a few sizes.
Any chance of you putting some photo’s of your Comet project on this forum ?.
Bob T.
By: radarsdesk - 28th September 2012 at 17:03
The people at Smiths metal centres are very good to deal with:
http://www.smithmetal.com/metals/stainless-steel-tube.htm
There are quite a few other stockholders:
http://aircraftmaterialsuk.com/data/alstst/T45.html
http://www.aerocommetals.co.uk/
http://www.allmetal.co.uk/products.aspx
Hope that’s of use.
Regards
Dave
By: radarsdesk - 28th September 2012 at 17:03
The people at Smiths metal centres are very good to deal with:
http://www.smithmetal.com/metals/stainless-steel-tube.htm
There are quite a few other stockholders:
http://aircraftmaterialsuk.com/data/alstst/T45.html
http://www.aerocommetals.co.uk/
http://www.allmetal.co.uk/products.aspx
Hope that’s of use.
Regards
Dave
By: austernj673 - 28th September 2012 at 14:39
Could try these….
By: austernj673 - 28th September 2012 at 14:39
Could try these….
By: Ken - 28th September 2012 at 13:37
Hello Bob, where can you get the 2.5″ by 16swg from, we needed some for the Comet u/c legs and couldnt get any so settled for 4130 which was only available in .120″ wall which we had to have specialy machined down to the correct thickness.
I dont think you will find it in 17swg as they havent made tubes in the odd number sizes for a very long time. Would it matter slightly thicker as the 16swg is only .006″ thicker.
Ken
By: Ken - 28th September 2012 at 13:37
Hello Bob, where can you get the 2.5″ by 16swg from, we needed some for the Comet u/c legs and couldnt get any so settled for 4130 which was only available in .120″ wall which we had to have specialy machined down to the correct thickness.
I dont think you will find it in 17swg as they havent made tubes in the odd number sizes for a very long time. Would it matter slightly thicker as the 16swg is only .006″ thicker.
Ken
By: DaveR - 28th September 2012 at 13:03
Bob,
When I have been after steel tubing for the Typhoon structure I found this place in Derby could supply almost any size I wanted (up to 3″ for the main spars). They were very reasonable priced but weren’t aircraft grade….give them a go if you are stuck
http://www.egglestonbros.co.uk/
Cheers
Dave
By: DaveR - 28th September 2012 at 13:03
Bob,
When I have been after steel tubing for the Typhoon structure I found this place in Derby could supply almost any size I wanted (up to 3″ for the main spars). They were very reasonable priced but weren’t aircraft grade….give them a go if you are stuck
http://www.egglestonbros.co.uk/
Cheers
Dave
By: sopwith.7f1 - 28th September 2012 at 11:53
I think that nick used an available 4130 aerofoil section tube for his U/C, rather than the original section. I think he also used some kind of hydraulic tubing for the trailing edge.
Bob T.
By: sopwith.7f1 - 28th September 2012 at 11:53
I think that nick used an available 4130 aerofoil section tube for his U/C, rather than the original section. I think he also used some kind of hydraulic tubing for the trailing edge.
Bob T.
By: Avro Avian - 28th September 2012 at 11:08
Ask Nick about what he used…
By: Avro Avian - 28th September 2012 at 11:08
Ask Nick about what he used…
By: sopwith.7f1 - 28th September 2012 at 09:57
It is proving to be quite a problem, especially as most manufacturers now only seem to make metric sized tube.
I can get away with commercial grade seamless tube for making the trailing edge section, but will need to find something better for the U/C tube. If I can’t find any 2.5″ in 17g then I will be forced to use 16g instead.
Bob T.
By: sopwith.7f1 - 28th September 2012 at 09:57
It is proving to be quite a problem, especially as most manufacturers now only seem to make metric sized tube.
I can get away with commercial grade seamless tube for making the trailing edge section, but will need to find something better for the U/C tube. If I can’t find any 2.5″ in 17g then I will be forced to use 16g instead.
Bob T.