dark light

Hurricane P3533

Hurricane P3533 had been alocated to 46 Squadron during 1940, but evidently did not reach that squadron before they withdrew from Norway. Instead, it seems to have been “diverted” to another squadron operating in France where it was evidently lost during May 1940.

I have attached a photograph of one of the ejector chutes recovered from a crash site in France which would seem to indicate the crash location of P3533. The pilot was evidently killed in the crash.

I am not currently at liberty to identify the crash location, but I am hopeful that someone might be able to attribute P3533 to a specific squadron. Obviously, it is not 46 Squadron and the AM Form 78 failed to specify the alternative squadron to which it was obviously issued.

Can anyone help?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

231

Send private message

By: northeagle - 12th March 2010 at 12:10

My information was for one squadron only: 607. ORB etc was left in France. Information came from the various pilots above and some others: P3535 AF-C was well known on the squadron.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

953

Send private message

By: VoyTech - 12th March 2010 at 10:18

It has been stated elsewhere that there may have been a clerical error on 607 Squadron re P3535 AF-C. This is totally wrong as no less than five 607 Squadron pilots are recorded as flying it: Will Gore, Francis Blackadder, Peter Parrott, Bobby Pumphrey and George Fidler.

Not necessarily ‘totally wrong’. Hurricanes in France are certainly not my area of research, but I believe there were quite a few well documented cases where the serial number of a particular aircraft was repeatedly and consistently misspelled in various documents (such as both ORBs and individual pilots’ log books). As an example, 308 Sqn’s F/Lt Wandzilak was shot down in Spitfire PL279 ZF-Z in August 1944, this aircraft having been used by the unit since June, but all squadron documents only ever referred to it as PL269 (which, incidentally, was the serial of the previous ZF-Z, sent away from the squadron in June 1944).

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 11th March 2010 at 17:31

Sounds like a case of Pilot Officer John Benzie to me maybe?

Not exactly, jetdrain.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

231

Send private message

By: northeagle - 11th March 2010 at 15:55

There could be a number of reasons why he was ‘wearing no parachute’

a) It was still in the plane on fire/damaged
b) It fell off him when he bailed out
c) It got caught up in plane and he preferred to end it quickly….

I actually never took the statement

“Fidler was wearing no parachute and he fell into a field near Bachy” to mean he didn’t have a parachute in the aircraft.. Rather it was not used on bailout…

Paul, you are correct as always.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

231

Send private message

By: northeagle - 11th March 2010 at 15:53

Why wasn’t George Fidler wearing a parachute; what was he sitting on?
I have no idea at all. This information was passed on to me from a French source and was handed down by an eyewitness. ‘He was found in a deep depression sans parachute’. Although he was CO of 607 Squadron his total experience on a Hurricane was three hours: he had been an armaments officer with 14 Group. He lasted less than three days.
It has been stated elsewhere that there may have been a clerical error on 607 Squadron re P3535 AF-C. This is totally wrong as no less than five 607 Squadron pilots are recorded as flying it: Will Gore, Francis Blackadder, Peter Parrott, Bobby Pumphrey and George Fidler. That is not to say P3533 was not on 607 Squadron only that no record of it has been found to date.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,142

Send private message

By: paulmcmillan - 11th March 2010 at 15:53

There could be a number of reasons why he was ‘wearing no parachute’

a) It was still in the plane on fire/damaged
b) It fell off him when he bailed out
c) It got caught up in plane and he preferred to end it quickly….

I actually never took the statement

“Fidler was wearing no parachute and he fell into a field near Bachy” to mean he didn’t have a parachute in the aircraft.. Rather it was not used on bailout…

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 11th March 2010 at 15:16

We can clearly rule out P3535. We are certainly looking at P3533 here.

Incidentally, and as Creaking Door has aluded to, what on earth was Fidler sitting on if not a parachute? Was he not wearing a parachute when he fell, or did he not actually have one? The latter would have made flying the Hurricane quite a problem I’d have thought unless he had a cushion!

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

12,419

Send private message

By: Creaking Door - 11th March 2010 at 13:08

Why wasn’t George Fidler wearing a parachute; what was he sitting on?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

231

Send private message

By: northeagle - 11th March 2010 at 12:46

Dave,
P3535 AF-C was flown by George Marley Fidler when it was shot down on a patrol over Cambrai. Fidler was wearing no parachute and he fell into a field near Bachy, now a housing estate known as ‘Allee des Comtes’. Fidler was buried by locals and later removed to Bachy Communal Cemetery. P3535 fell into a field known as ‘Ferne Marchand’: Meadow of Wanhain-bachey.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

14

Send private message

By: drainjet - 11th March 2010 at 12:23

Sounds like a case of Pilot Officer John Benzie to me maybe?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 11th March 2010 at 08:54

It is in the general area, but off to the east of Cambrai. Quite a way from Bachy. Do we know that crash was actually at Bachy, or is it just that the pilot of your Hurricane was buried there?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

895

Send private message

By: Thunderbird167 - 11th March 2010 at 07:46

The closest serial that I have as being lost in France is P3535 AF:C which crashed at Bachy on 19/05/40.

Given the similarity in the numbers is it possible that the records recording the demise of P3535 could be incorrect and that it was P3533 ?

Is the crash area in the right vicinity ?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

100,651

Send private message

By: Arabella-Cox - 10th March 2010 at 19:53

It is certainly not unkown for items from other airframes to get into another specific aircraft. It is possible it has happened in this case. However, since the crash site in question is in France, is believed to have been during May 1940 and P3533 is shown to have been lost in France in May 1940 there is a high probability that this is, indeed, the crash site of P3533.

The question is; what squadron was P3533 with at the time of its loss? And what was the date of that loss?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

35

Send private message

By: Andywis - 10th March 2010 at 19:38

Hurricane loss

Hi;

Is it feasible/possible that although the piece of equipment came from P3533 at some time, it ended up somehow in another aircraft. Is it possible to confirm the identity of the aircraft you are researching as definately P3533??

regards,

Andy Wis

Sign in to post a reply