dark light

IWM Duxford Sunderland

Hi all,

Just a quick question.
Before IWM’s Sunderland was restored, it’s fuselage was sliced horizontally in two to enable it to be transported. Was there a joint or was the metal actually cut?

Cheers

cees

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

1,647

Send private message

By: jeepman - 6th February 2009 at 12:33

wasn’t the RAFM’s example moved to Hendon the same way?

Roger Smith.

Chapter in “Epics of Aviation Archaeology” published by Patrick Stephens Limited way back when. Fuselage moved on side

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

5,170

Send private message

By: Wyvernfan - 6th February 2009 at 11:41

Probably showing my age but…

I seem to recall being on a School trip to Duxford mid 80’s ans seeing an aircraft which I think was the Sunderland split in half in a canvas hanger or temporary building somewhere between hanger 4 and what is now the American Hanger?

or am I just going nucking futs?

I think that was probably the Airspeed Ambassador (Elizabethan), that was housed for a long time in a canvas type building in the position you suggest.. although i don’t think this was ever ‘split in half’.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

532

Send private message

By: Bograt - 6th February 2009 at 09:04

Yes, it was cut; I remember them stitching it all back together in the hangar that we shared with it when I was a volunteer on the non-flying B-17.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

937

Send private message

By: Pondskater - 6th February 2009 at 00:27

Found this, a new Sunderland fuselage, panelled and just out of the jigs. You can see where the tail joint is – had to be that far back so as not to split the keel.

This would be about as small as you can make a Sunderland without cutting.

http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc106/pondskater/1424.jpg

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

937

Send private message

By: Pondskater - 6th February 2009 at 00:03

Cees,

There is no horizontal joint in the Sunderland. The whole fuselage was made in one huge piece, with the exception of the tail section – there is a contruction joint just aft of the keel’s rear step, enabling the tail section to be removed.

I can only presume that the fuselage frames were cut. One of the Shorts old boys at Rochester told me that, years ago, he could see the line on the IWM Sunderland where the join had been panelled over. They hadn’t, at that time, used the correct sequence of panels and the horizontal line of the cut was visible. However, it has been extensively restored since then and I certainly didn’t notice the join when I saw it last year.

The RAF Museum’s example was moved in 1971 by a team from 71 MU. The tail and wings went by road but the hull was put into an Army landing craft and moved by sea. Not sure how they got it from the Thames to Hendon. A photo of that would be something!

Allan

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

895

Send private message

By: Old Fart - 5th February 2009 at 23:45

Probably showing my age but…

I seem to recall being on a School trip to Duxford mid 80’s ans seeing an aircraft which I think was the Sunderland split in half in a canvas hanger or temporary building somewhere between hanger 4 and what is now the American Hanger?

or am I just going nuts?

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,488

Send private message

By: RPSmith - 5th February 2009 at 19:49

wasn’t the RAFM’s example moved to Hendon the same way?

Roger Smith.

Member for:

19 years 1 month

Posts:

2,569

Send private message

By: BlueRobin - 5th February 2009 at 19:47

and when can we see inside it again? I miss that 😮

Sign in to post a reply