February 2, 2009 at 8:57 am
Thought i would share this with you all
Regards
Bwb
Photo credit: Jim Beasley
By: Flygirl - 3rd February 2009 at 18:53
I still think the red spinner would have looked better 🙂
I think the blue looks good!
By: bombsaway - 3rd February 2009 at 18:25
Fantastic to see her in the air! great colour scheme as well 😀
By: BSG-75 - 3rd February 2009 at 09:48
Hi ,not all griffon engined spits are low backs !!!
Steve
I know – I mean that (IMHO) they should be – they just look right to me (just a view)
By: Flygirl - 3rd February 2009 at 09:25
Lovely shots.
By: Seafuryfan - 3rd February 2009 at 00:27
I’m with you there, the longer nose & tear drop canopy make the airframe look more “balanced” (IMHO) the Griffon models are my personal favourites.
Real shame that a machine that was built to protect these shores needed to go to the US to allow its return to its natural enviroment.:mad:
Disagree with you there, Sage. Free trade across the water helps to keep the restoration movement ticking along. Besides, why not let the Americans see more Spits? We’ve got loads! 🙂
By: spade grip - 2nd February 2009 at 23:36
Great to see her in the air at last, it was just a pity that wasn’t at last years Legends, mind you not for the want of trying. Well done Jim Beasley, TFC and Mark 12.
By: mackerel - 2nd February 2009 at 23:16
did you ever buy your own Daz from that link I sent you !?
lovely looking aircraft, and (IMHO) shows why (IMHO) Griffon engined Spitfires have low backs, and Merlin high backs, it just seems right that way.
Hi ,not all griffon engined spits are low backs !!!
Steve
By: Sage the Owl - 2nd February 2009 at 22:51
lovely looking aircraft, and (IMHO) shows why (IMHO) Griffon engined Spitfires have low backs, and Merlin high backs, it just seems right that way.
I’m with you there, the longer nose & tear drop canopy make the airframe look more “balanced” (IMHO) the Griffon models are my personal favourites.
Real shame that a machine that was built to protect these shores needed to go to the US to allow its return to its natural enviroment.:mad:
By: DazDaMan - 2nd February 2009 at 17:46
No, sad to say I didn’t, lack of funding etc… :rolleyes:
By: BSG-75 - 2nd February 2009 at 16:47
Wow, that’s beautiful! Thanks for posting 🙂
did you ever buy your own Daz from that link I sent you !?
lovely looking aircraft, and (IMHO) shows why (IMHO) Griffon engined Spitfires have low backs, and Merlin high backs, it just seems right that way.
By: Boghopper - 2nd February 2009 at 14:29
Good to see air to air photos of that hot ship. Seems ages ago the machine was in our hangar.





By: DazDaMan - 2nd February 2009 at 13:00
Wow, that’s beautiful! Thanks for posting 🙂
By: bentwingbomber - 2nd February 2009 at 10:49
28 Squadron
Researched by Mr. Mk12 and painted by Vintage Fabrics
Spinner colour and artwork were at the then owners request. The spinner colours were A flight red B flight Blue the same as 80 sqn
regards
bwb
By: TempestV - 2nd February 2009 at 10:47
Lovely colour scheme.
Which squadron does this represent?
I am familiar with 80 Squadron based Hornets, and their spinners were painted to distinguish between Blue or Red flight, and white was reserved for the CO.
Is this the same for this aircraft?
By: CIRCUS 6 - 2nd February 2009 at 10:46
Nice one BWB, Good to see 969 up where she belongs. Have you forwarded the images to the CAA?!:diablo::diablo:
C 6
By: bentwingbomber - 2nd February 2009 at 10:43
Couple more.
regards
bwb
By: Dan Johnson - 2nd February 2009 at 10:23
I still think the red spinner would have looked better 🙂

By: Mark V - 2nd February 2009 at 09:31
Thank you BWB – looks lovely and great to see her in the air again 🙂