Not a regular poster here so at the risk of being shot down in flames re the new format, sorry I just don’t like it. Having taken the magazine for over 20 years it’s not that I’m adverse to change, but it seems to be a triumph of style over substance. The font on some of the items is hard to read (Briefings) and in some cases relegated to the status of a foot note (Eagle Hurricane). Some items continue to hold their own but others just seem to be ‘fillers’; two pages describing 12 roundels anyone?

Coupled with the previously discussed supplement I think it’s far from Fly Past’s finest hour, reminds me of the books I used to get from the library as a kid- lots of pictures and scant info.

OK, my flack jacket is on so go ahead…..