You have not corrected me at any point, and frankly havnt provided any ‘data’ yourself- just ranted about how little I know and how much you know.:rolleyes:

The facts speak for themselves as to who’s relying on one liners as compared to providing actual data. As I mentioned earlier, you are welcome to ask Harry or anyone else- but pass judgements, and you will be replied to.

My post asking Neptune about his isuue with Harry is as it was posted it has not been edited and you know it, this is yet another case of you wanting people to do or say something that they have not. I am actually starting to get quite angry about your insistance that I accused harry as there is no evidence that I have and only you seem to have seen this. So I state one last time

I DID NOT EDIT MY POST AT ANY POINT, I HAVE NOT ACCUSED HARRY OF ANYTHING AND I SIMPLY ASKED FOR MORE FACTS.

Keep saying it all you want mate. If you really wanted more information, you would have directly PM’ed Neptune and Harry. I reserve my opinion on your motives.

Coming to your “I am starting to get quite angry”- well, you should have thought about that before passing judgemental comments in the PRC thread, eh? Not really much fun, when the shoe is on the other foot.

For someone who did not want the PRC involved in this thread you have spent an awfull lot of time talking about it and put great effort into trying to get me to talk about it.:rolleyes:

The thread makes it clear that the PRC was compared to India in terms of MIC, and my replies are on topic.

I assumed you were aware of what discussion was going on when you jumped in, but I should have known better. :rolleyes:

As regards the rest, I am just pointing out – for the record- that I consider you to be firmly on the PRC side, so that you kindly dont pull the objective commentator sht!ck anymore when it comes to commenting on India or the like.

I find it amusing that you salute Fedaykins post but then ignore his suggestion and post a reply to me!:D

My post to Fedaykin, is AFTER I replied to you. Ergo, it would be also a valid conclusion if you were to think that I read your comment first, replied to it, and then read his and replied. :rolleyes:

I find your lack of reading comprehension..disturbing.